The telecom industry aided by the US FCC and Canadian Health Canada and various European agencies are vigorously pushing the 5G roll out because there are possibly trillions of dollars to be made over the next 5 years.
And there is NO research that proves that 5G is safe. In fact, there are many studies that prove that the current 4G is not safe.
by John P. Thomas
Health Impact News
Public attention about 5G has been focused on the plans of telecom companies to install millions of small cell towers on electric utility poles, on public buildings and schools, on bus stop shelters, in public parks, and anywhere they want in national parks and on federally owned land.
In local urban communities there would be a cell tower approximately every 500 feet along every street.
As bad as these small cell towers might seem from the standpoint of constant exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation in close proximity to the source, perhaps an even more alarming prospect will be the beaming of millimeter length microwaves at the earth from thousands of new communication satellites.
The FCC gave approval to SpaceX on March 29, 2018, to launch 4,425 satellites into low orbit around the Earth. [1]
The total number of satellites that is expected to be put into low and high orbit by several companies will be 20,000 satellites. [1]
See full article at
Matt Landman in Tucson Arizona discussing Cell tower radiation and the impacts of 5G.
Active Denial Systems, Suicide of Cell tower workers,
Like being in a body scanner all the time.
4 minute video
https://www.facebook.com/landman808/videos/10160452803195538/
Bandara P, Carpenter DO. Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact. The Lancet. 2(12):Pe512-e514, December 01, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30221-3.
Download open access paper: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(18)30221-3/fulltext
Since this commentary has no abstract, here are the first and last paragraphs:
“As the Planetary Health Alliance moves forward after a productive second annual meeting, a discussion on the rapid global proliferation of artificial electromagnetic fields would now be apt. The most notable is the blanket of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, largely microwave radiation generated for wireless communication and surveillance technologies, as mounting scientific evidence suggests that prolonged exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation has serious biological and health effects. However, public exposure regulations in most countries continue to be based on the guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), which were established in the 1990s on the belief that only acute thermal effects are hazardous. Prevention of tissue heating by radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is now proven to be ineffective in preventing biochemical and physiological interference. For example, acute non-thermal exposure has been shown to alter human brain metabolism by NIH scientists, electrical activity in the brain, and systemic immune responses. Chronic exposure has been associated with increased oxidative stress and DNA damage and cancer risk.
Laboratory studies, including large rodent studies by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) and Ramazzini Institute of Italy, confirm these biological and health effects in vivo. As we address the threats to human health from the changing environmental conditions due to human activity, the increasing exposure to artificial electromagnetic radiation needs to be included in this discussion.”
<snip>
“At a time when environmental health scientists tackle serious global issues such as climate change and chemical toxicants in public health, there is an urgent need to address so-called electrosmog. A genuine evidence-based approach to the risk assessment and regulation of anthropogenic electromagnetic fields will help the health of us all, as well as that of our planetary home. Some government health authorities have recently taken steps to reduce public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation by regulating use of wireless devices by children and recommending preferential use of wired communication devices in general, but this ought to be a coordinated international effort.”
—
Most relevant posts on Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
International EMF Scientist Appeal
Scientists and Doctors Demand Moratorium on 5G
ICNIRP’s Exposure Guidelines for Radio Frequency Fields
WHO Radiofrequency Radiation Policy
What’s Wrong with Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits? (SAR)
NTP Cell Phone Radiation Study: Final Reports
Ramazzini Institute Cell Phone Radiation Study Replicates NTP Study
5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health?
Cell Phone Towers are Largest Contributor to Environmental Radiofrequency Radiation
Cell Tower Radiation Affects Wildlife: Dept. of Interior Attacks FCC
Electromagnetic fields threaten wildlife
International Perspective on Health Effects of Low Intensity Non-Ionizing RadiationPowerWatch: 1,670 Scientific Papers on EMF (1979 – 2018)
Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields: 833 Studies
Recent Research on Wireless Radiation and Electromagnetic Fields (> 500 studies)
——————-
Thanks to Joel Moskowitz for sending this out.
Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., Director Center for Family and Community Health School of Public Health University of California, Berkeley Electromagnetic Radiation Safety Website: https://www.saferemr.comFacebook: https://www.facebook.com/SaferEMR Twitter: @berkeleyprc
“We believe that the link between radiofrequency (RF) radiation and tumors in male rats is real,” says John Bucher, the former associate director of the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP).
The announcement accompanies this morning’s release of the NTP final reports of studies on cancer in rats and mice exposed to cell phone radiation. Bucher’s project, the largest in NTP history, cost $30 million and took more than ten years to complete.
See more details at https://microwavenews.com/news-center/ntp-final-rf-report
The meaning of this is that the probability of a person getting cancer increases with the total lifetime exposure to RFRadiation. Exposure is a function of the intensity of the RFR and the duration. So, 10 years of heavy cellphone usage (phone against the head) will dramatically increase the chances of brain cancer. A user may be lucky or may not be lucky in this gamble.
And Health Canada and the FCC maintain that RFR has no adverse health effects, especially cancer. Does this mean that these organizations are derelict in their duties to protect public heath or does it mean that they have been influenced or taken over by industry or military agencies?
https://smartgridawareness.org/rf-health-effects/comparison-values/
The above webpage was updated on October 15, 2018.
Christian Blom talks about his electro-hypersensitivy (EHS) and subsequent cancer in the neck and throat from 10 years of cell phone use.
His doctors did not question him about cell phone use and did not want to know anything about it. Afterwards, he was sent to a psychiatric clinic and became scared he would be classified as a madman.
Corporate Ties That Bind: An Examination of Corporate Manipulation and Vested Interest in Public HealthMartin J. Walker
This is a great book for those that are inquisitive about the major injustices committed by CORPORATIONS. ( PVC, ASBESTOS, Spanish Toxic Oil Syndrome to name just a few)
|
Guest’s website: https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/
= = =
– https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-05-01-is-radar-the-cause-of-the-cancer-cluster-ocular-melanomas/
– https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-04-28-wireless-charging-is-now-a-reality/
– https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-04-25-health-risks-associated-with-cfl-and-led-light-bulbs/
– https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-04-23-bc-hydro-applying-to-bcuc-to-reduce-net-metering-benefits/
See BCUC & Smart Meter Fires Report (July 2017): https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/bcuc-smart-meter-fires-the-failure-to-protect/)
Guest’s website: https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/
= = =
BC Hydro Underground Substation – https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-04-16-5g-will-be-much-worse-stronger-than-weve-been-told/ (1)
Brain Tumour Cancer Cluster (Glioblastomas) – https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-04-08-erin-brockovich-interested-in-multiple-glioblastomas-in-florida/ (2)
Children – https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-04-14-children-suffering-psychologically-due-to-wireless-gadgets/ (1 & 2)
NTP – https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-04-09-inside-info-about-the-peer-review-of-the-ntp-report/ (1 & 2)
Ramazzini – https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/z/2017-02-15-world-renowned-italian-institute-confirms-results-of-national-toxicology-program/ (4 & Letters)
See BCUC & Smart Meter Fires Report (July 2017): https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/bcuc-smart-meter-fires-the-failure-to-protect/)