Citizens Forum Sept 7 2016 With Dr Martin Blank, the Real Physical effects to humans from Exposure to Electromagnetic Radiation
Dr Blank has written and collaborated on many scientific papers. He is also the author of Overpowered The Dangers of Electromagnetic Radiation (EMF) and What You Can Do about It
Please sign these 2 petitions:
e-404 (Cellphone towers):
https://petitions.parl.gc.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-404
e-406 (Smart meters):
https://petitions.parl.gc.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-406
Good Afternoon,
Along with the on-going Moms Who Care campaign (www.MomsWhoCare.ca) which is live until the mid October scheduled response from the Government, there are two active e-petitions that have been submitted by C4ST riding reps to the Liberal government via their new E-Petition platform. They are focused on cell towers and smart meters. Once they reach 500 signatories they will be read into the House of Commons upon closing supporting the Moms Who Care campaign as well as discussion between Members of Parliament and the government.
Please take two minutes and add your name to the petitions below.
A petition is used to draw attention to an issue of public interest or concern and to request that the House of Commons, the Government of Canada, a Minister of the Crown, or a Member of the House of Commons take some action.
You, the supporters, the signatories, and the sponsor will be notified by e-mail when the response is tabled in the House. A copy will also be found on the e petition website along with the original petition.
The Standing Orders (the rules governing the House of Commons) require the government to respond within 45 calendar days to every petition presented in the House of Commons.
Please take two minutes and add your name to the petitions below.
Sincerely,
Frank Clegg
C4ST – CEO
e-404 (Cellphone towers):
https://petitions.parl.gc.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-404
e-406 (Smart meters):
https://petitions.parl.gc.ca/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-406
In November 2014, Lloyd Burrell of ElectricSense published an excellent review of how the use of Cell Phones can cause cancer.
Lloyd has just updated this article with recent information.
Please read this updated article. The details are frightening.
I studied the article and found this chilling projection by Lloyd:
43. Cell Phone Radiation Cancer Time Bomb: To give a sense to what this latency period could mean in terms of the incidence of brain tumors in the years to come, researcher Lloyd Morgan produced this alarming graphic showing that brain tumor cases could reach epidemic proportions within the next decade:
This projection indicates that in 2019 there will be about 380,000 new brain tumors diagnosed in the US. This is addition to all of the brain tumors diagnosed in the previous years. And judging by the increase from year to year there will be many more each year in the subsequent years.
See full article by Lloyd Burrell at ElectricSense
http://www.electricsense.com/8822/cell-phones-cause-cancer-fact/
Sharon Noble, the director of the Coalition to Stop Smart Meters in BC, is a guest of Jim Goddard who hosts the Goddard Report on TalkDigitalNetwork.com. Sharon has been Jim’s guest many times and the show is available on-line.
In this interview, Sharon discusses recent research that shows that there is now a proven connection between Cell Phone use and Heart and Brain Tumors.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, famed worldwide as “rescuers” and titans of justice, has been summoned by Capt. Jerry Flynn (ret.) to rescue Canada from radiation pollution.
RCMP, also known as “the Force” and the “Mounties,” is a federal national police force that works on a contract basis with three territories, eight provinces, 190 municipalities, 184 aboriginal communities and three international airports.
Flynn this week called on the Public Health Agency of Canada to direct RCMP “to conduct a criminal investigation into Canada’s radio frequency and extremely low frequency scientific community beginning with Health Canada’s radiation protection bureau.”
Read More here – http://www.odwyerpr.com/story/public/6883/2016-05-11/royal-canadian-police-summoned-wi-fi-threat.html
I have a GigaHertz HF59B RF-analyzer meter which allows me to measure RFR (radio frequency radiation) from many sources like cell towers, cell phones, cordless DECT phones and wireless routers. The meter shows the readings on a screen in µW/m² in 3 ranges from 0.01 to 20,000. And there is a speaker that allows me to listen to the various radiation so I can tell if it is a cell tower, cordless phone or a wifi router. I consider this meter indispensable in my RFRadiation Detective work.
One day when I was assisting at a local seniors centre some seniors with computer problems, I showed the effect of the local wireless wifi router on my HF59B meter. The meter’s sound was turned up and this made my students pay close attention. After some discussion about the use of wifi routers and the potential health effects, one student invited me to look what was going on in his home.
So, I went for tea and cookies and did some RFR measuring and what I found was very interesting and disturbing.
Telus had installed a wireless router to handle several Optik TVs in the house. This setup worked well except that the wireless function was not necessary. The router was set on top of the piano close to the dining table and the computer desk, all within 6 feet. The RFR from this router measured at 1 ft peaked at 20,000 µW/m² which is very very high. So the people eating at the table or working at the computer desk would have high RFR exposure.
Nearby, Shaw had installed a wireless router to handle the single wireless laptop computer in the house. This router was set on the floor next to the computer desk and close to the dining table. The RFR from this router measured at 1 ft peaked at about 5,000 µW/m² which is quite high.
In summary, this small house was saturated with RFR from the 2 high powered routers. Also, the small house had aluminum siding which would have kept most of the RFR bouncing around inside the house increasing the exposure many times. I think that the siding may not have been grounded.
I believe that RFR at any level has an impact on the health of the people involved. This fact is supported by 1000’s of reports but dismissed by governments and telecommunication companies because of major financial pressures. High levels of RFR create more health problems. Upon questioning the couple that lived in the house, they said that they were tired a lot of the time and had head aches often. The wife said that she liked getting out of the house, maybe because she felt uncomfortable when in the house.
We discussed the findings and they instructed me to turn off the wifi on both routers and to hook up the laptop to the Shaw router using a cat5 cable which I did.
Now there is no wifi RFR in the house and the levels were down to less than 5 µW/m² with the occasional spike from outside of the house to 10 µW/m². I surveyed the home and the RFR was very low in all rooms.
I hope to interview the couple later to determine if they find any difference in life in a RFR free home.
Findings
1 – Telus had a router with high level wifi for no purpose. The optik TV setup did not need the wifi function.
2 – Neither Telus or Shaw informed the customer of possible health effects of high levels of wifi RFR.
3 – Average people know nothing about the possible health effects of wifi.
See http://ehtrust.org/policy/international-policy-actions-on-wireless/
I had thought that the Apple iPad was only wireless but that is apparently not so.
You can use the iPad connected by the router by a wire (CAT5 cable is technical term) and you can turn the wireless function off in both the router and the iPad.
Wow, now I can authorize the use of wired iPads by my grand kids. And I can now use an iPad with them.
See this facebook group for details.
Responsible iPad Use in Classrooms – Petaluma
https://www.facebook.com/groups/966677386741719/
