[4G – 5G Millimeter Waves Throughput (Penetration) – ANFR – ANSES – Anthony B. Miller– Arthur Firstenberg – AT&T – BC Ferries – Big Telecom – Birds – Blake Levitt – Brain Tumour Tracking – Brillouin Precursors – Cancer – CDC – CDPH – Cell Phones – Cell Towers / Base Stations – Children – Conflict of Interest – CTIA – Dafna Tachover, We Are the Evidence – Daniel Krewski, Royal Society – Dimitris J. Panagopoulos – DNA – Doctor Don Maisch – EHS – ElectroSmog – Emilie van Deventer – EMR – Eyes – FCC – Fertility – Generation Zapped by Sabine El Gemayel – George L. Carlo – Group 1 & 2B – Health Canada Safety Code 6 – Heart – IARC – ICNIRP – International EMF Scientist Appeal – Lawsuit – Lennart Hardell – Marc Arazi Interview by Art Joyce re Phonegate Scandal – Media – Michael Repacholi – Mobile Stations – NTP – Olle Johansson – PAVE PAWS – Perry Kendall – Phased Array Antennas Directed Beams – Physicians for Safe Technology – RF Microwave Radiation Sickness – Richard Albanese, Brooks Air Force Base – Safety – SAR – Sherry Ridout Letter to Pat Coppard, Times Colonist – Smartphones – Smart Appliances, Cities & Homes – Sprint – Studies – T-Mobile – The Zapping of America by Paul Brodeur – Tobacco – Transportable Stations – Verizon – Wendy Mesley, CBC Marketplace – WHO – Wi-Fi – Wireless Devices | BC – Canada – Belgium – EU – France – Russia – UK – Atlanta & California & Indiana & Massachusetts & Michigan & New Jersey & Texas & Virginia & Washington & Washington DC, USA] & Book & Documentary
1) A MUST READ! 5G technology explained in depth with info I’ve never seen before. Arthur Firstenberg explains how the beams will be directed, resulting in extremely high power that will be capable of penetrating deeply into our bodies. Recall recently there was an article where a telecom said that the millliwave technology was proving to go farther and penetrate better than first thought [1) – https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2018-01-19-industry-finds-5g-milliwaves-go-farther-penetrate-better-than-first-thought/]. This is why. It is urgent that this info reach our politicians at all levels. This must be stopped before it gets started, which is slated to hit big time within the next year or so.
(click on photos to enlarge)
5G – FROM BLANKETS TO BULLETS
“Another important fact about radiation from phased array antennas is this: it penetrates much deeper into the human body and the assumptions that the FCC’s exposure limits are based on do not apply. This was brought to everyone’s attention by Dr. Richard Albanese of Brooks Air Force Base in connection with PAVE PAWS and was reported on in Microwave News in 2002. When an ordinary electromagnetic field enters the body, it causes charges to move and currents to flow. But when extremely short electromagnetic pulses enter the body, something else happens: the moving charges themselves become little antennas that re-radiate the electromagnetic field and send it deeper into the body.
These re-radiated waves are called Brillouin precursors. They become significant when either the power or the phase of the waves changes rapidly enough. 5G will probably satisfy both requirements. This means that the reassurance we are being given—that these millimeter waves are too short to penetrate far into the body—is not true.”
http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/?page_id=1603
2) Dr. Hardell and others, such as Dr. Don Maisch, for many years have been warning about the conflicts of interest within WHO and IARC as well as ICNIRP. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/
It’s one thing for ICNIRP, which has always been driven by the industry and the military, to be totally biased, but for the WHO and IARC to be controlled by the same people is unconscionable. The EMF Project was headed by Repacholi and then handed to his “student” van Deventer, who is still in charge. The EMF panel that is reviewing the “current status” of the science is filled with ICNIRP people, so we know what the outcome will be. Similar to the reviews of Safety Code 6, the studies are cherry picked and any additional comments by non-panel researchers are ignored.
The system is so rigged from beginning to end. WHO quotes ICNIRP. Health Canada [HC] quotes WHO. Provincial authorities, like Kendall, quote HC. No one does anything to protect us because ICNIRP establishes the guidelines, makes the decisions. We have to begin to organize to support Hardell and others to change this system. This from a member:
“Stunning conflicts if interests at ICNIRP! Not only Emilie van Deventer, but most of the scientists.
You find the English text and pdf document near the bottom.”
http://www.avaate.org/spip.php?article2624
3) A member recommends everyone get a copy of The Epoch Times, edition Jan. 18-24. There is an article of great interest — one that should garner attention. Word really is getting around.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-dark-side-of-wireless-technology_2403062.html
Here is what was sent to me:
“The January 18-24th edition of The Epoch Times had a huge, full-page-spread article titled, “The dark side of wireless technology” about wireless technology of course and about a “new film that explores the hidden health problems linked to constant connectivity.” (And when I say a huge, full-page spread, this paper still uses the old, huge, broad sheets!)
Under the photo of some city somewhere there is the caption, “Our bodies are subjected to one quintillion [ a one with 18 zeros!] times more electromagnetic radiation compared to just one decade ago, according to Olle Johansson, associate professor in neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden.”
While I know that this won’t be news to you, I was impressed to find this long, in-depth article in a serious newspaper available freely around Victoria.
As someone who used to work in media, I know for a fact that all newsrooms are crammed with reporters and journalists first thing every morning scouring all other media outlets to see who is writing on what. This article, I can assure you, will be noticed. Of course what the other media outlets will do with this information, that’s impossible to guess. I just hope that enough people will see and read this one article to begin with. That would be good a start.
I highly recommend you look it up and let people on your updates know about it, also, so that they can pick up a copy and spread it among their quite-possibly-reluctant family members and friends. (Reluctant in the sense that many people either don’t have a clue, or don’t want to know should anything interfere with their ‘enjoyment’ of electronics. Just look at Perry Kendall! I rest my case.)”
Letters:
From: Sherry Ridout (name given with permission.)
Sent: January 20, 2018
To : Coppard, Pat (Times Colonist) [mailto:PCoppard@timescolonist.com]
Re: Smartphone hangups
Dear Patricia,
Thanks so much for your timely article in the Parenting section of today’s paper. You have covered so many pertinent issues but missed one that you may not be aware of…the health and safety concerns for our children due to the microwave radiation being emitted by wireless devices like cell phones. I have written a letter to the editor re. the smoking ban at BC Ferries. Please see below to see the connection to your article:
Congratulations to B.C. Ferries for banning a known carcinogen from their vessels and adjacent sites. The adverse health effects of tobacco smoke have been known for over 20 years but it takes a long time to prove harm and change habits and cultural mores. Tobacco smoke didn’t start out as a ‘known carcinogen’. It worked its way up the classification ladder as studies were done on the cumulative effects. It took years to prove the detrimental health effects and many suffered while our regulatory bodies tried to catch up.
The same scenario is playing out today with another carcinogen. I wonder how long it will take to apply precautionary regulations to electromagnetic radiation which in 2011, was re-classified by IARC/WHO as a Group 2B, Possible Human Carcinogen (Baan et al, 2011). This classification applies to ALL radiation sources, including cell and cordless phones, cell towers, WI-FI, wireless laptops, electronic baby monitors and ‘smart’ meters. There are safe ways to use this amazing technology but they will need to be regulated.
Today, the same scientists and advisors of IARC, who were responsible for the ‘Possible Carcinogen’ classification in 2011, lobbied the WHO and the UN repeatedly to urgently upgrade the classification to a Group 1 – Known Carcinogen! How long till we see action on this recommendation and how many citizens will be unknowingly harmed while we wait?
You may want to take a quick look at the two blog articles below. They were posted Jan. 18, 2018 and provide a quick overview of the concerns being addressed by scientists who study the effects of electromagnetic radiation on all living organisms. Our Safety Code 6 guidelines are drastically outdated, concerned only with thermal effects. It is now known that this pulsed radiation affects cells and even crosses the brain’s blood barrier. I look forward to future articles that will educate your reading public about safe uses of our wireless gadgets. Thanks again for your interest in this area.
– https://chameleonfire1.wordpress.com/2018/01/18/phonegate-scandal-goes-unreported-in-canadian-media/
– https://chameleonfire1.wordpress.com/2018/01/19/phonegate-interview-with-dr-marc-arazi/
Sherry Ridout
Sharon Noble
Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
Word of mouth is our best weapon — So shoot your mouth off!