2017-06-14 In some US states, bills are being pushed through re. microcells and 5G. Here, there is no debate at all.

[5G – ALARA As Low As Reasonably Achievable Principle – American Cancer Society – Brain Glioma Tumours – Children – Corruption – DNA – EHS – ELF – HB 310 Microcells / Small Cells Public Right-of-way Siting Legislation – Health Canada Statements re CBC’s Marketplace with Wendy Mesley on Cell Phones – Heart Schwannomas – HESA – ICEMS – ISED – Itron – Jane PhilpottJerry Flynn Letter to Justin Trudeau & The Fifth Estate – Lawsuits re Wireless Devices – Norbert Duerichen – NTP Study – Phil Bourke – Precautionary Principle – RF EMFs – Safety Code 6 – Smart Meters Microwave Power Density – Tim Singer | BC – Canada – North Carolina & Oklahoma, USA] & (video)

1)    An opinion piece written re. 5G microcell bills being rammed through the state house in North Carolina. This is bad, but did the legislature in BC or the Parliament in Ottawa even consider that these things are being promoted by the “Innovation, Science and Economic Development Dept (formerly Industry Canada) ? ISCD is considering only the economic portion and ignoring the science.


(click on photos to enlarge)

Disconnect HB 310 to prevent health risks

“House Bill 310 will allow fifth generation mobile systems, known as 5G facilities, to be placed within feet of single-family homes and on multifamily homes, schools, day care centers, recreation centers and more. These facilities can cause adverse health effects ranging from cancer to debilitating headaches to insomnia, infertility and more. According to three international experts who wrote to the General Assembly to voice their concerns and urge the defeat of this bill, the adverse health effects from 5G facilities will almost certainly be worse than those of cell phones. Yet the House largely rejected their expertise and risked public health by promoting the telecommunications industry and 5G technology in such a way that everyone must accept it. Nobody can say no if the Senate approves it.”


2)    I was looking for some info for someone and came across this website which I had shared some time ago. There is a very short, very instructive YouTube . Scroll down. It is entitled “Microwave Power Density: Health effects vs. safety standards”.   It speaks of smeters and demonstrates clearly why we cannot stop fighting having these on our homes. And the levels of power measured will be the “average”. ITRON itself states that the average is significantly higher than stated in this YouTube, and the peaks are much higher still.

https://www.emfanalysis.com/research/  (02:48 minutes)


3)    A law firm in Oklahoma is preparing for lawsuits due to exposure to 5G technology.

The Looming Health Risk of 5G Technology

The likely danger by 5G is that network changes will require an increase in the number of wireless transmitters used. Early announcements of the study also suggest that 5G might bring our country dangerously close to exceeding the defined limits for power density, which could very well threaten the health of individuals to a degree not yet seen. Cell Phone Cancer could continue to become a more common occurrence.” 


4)    Several of us received responses to our letters to Health Canada about their horribly irresponsible and misleading statement in Wendy Mesley’s CBC Marketplace program, saying that it is safe for children to use cell phones 24/7/365.  Health Canada’s response and replies by some of us are below in Letters.


From: Bourke, Phil (HC/SC) [mailto:phil.bourke@canada.ca] On Behalf Of Singer, Tim (HC/SC)
Sent: June 14, 2017 5:50 AM
To: Sharon Noble

Subject: Re: CBC’s Marketplace episode on cellular phones

Dear Mrs. Noble, (and everyone else)

Thank you for your correspondence of March 25, 2017, addressed to the Honourable Jane Philpott, Minister of Health, concerning the broadcast of an episode of CBC’s Marketplace on cellular phones. I have been asked to respond on behalf of the Minister. I apologize for the delay in responding.

I wish to clarify the statement you quoted from the Marketplace broadcast, attributed to the Department. Health Canada’s complete statement provided to CBC is as follows:

“Safety Code 6 limits for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) energy are designed to provide protection for all age groups, including children, on a continuous basis (24 hours a day/seven days a week). This means that if someone, including a small child, were to be exposed to RF energy from multiple sources for 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, within the Safety Code 6 limits, there would be no adverse health effects.”

Health Canada’s intention was not to make a statement respecting exposure to a specific device. The original purpose of this statement was to clarify that Safety Code 6 provides protection for all age groups.

If individuals are concerned, the following practical measures can be taken to reduce your RF energy exposure when using a cell phone:

  • limiting the length of cell phone calls;
  • using “hands-free” devices; and
  • replacing cell phone calls with text messages.

As mentioned in my email to you of February 1, 2017, Health Canada is aware that a few jurisdictions have applied more restrictive limits for RF field exposures from cell towers, although the scientific evidence does not support the need for limits that are more restrictive than Safety Code 6. Additionally, in many instances these restrictive limits are not applied to other wireless devices in these same jurisdictions.

Thank you again for taking the time to write about this important issue. I hope my comments are helpful.

Tim Singer
Director General, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate
Health Canada / Government of Canada


= = =

From: Sharon Noble
Sent: June 14, 2017 10:25 AM
To: phil.bourke@canada.ca; tim.singer@canada.ca; Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca
Cc: bill.casey@parl.gc.ca; Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca; don.davies@parl.gc.ca; Ramez.Ayoub@parl.gc.ca; colin.carrie@parl.gc.ca; Doug.Eyolfson@parl.gc.ca; Rachael.Harder@parl.gc.ca; Darshan.Kang@parl.gc.ca; John.Oliver@parl.gc.ca; Sonia.Sidhu@parl.gc.ca; justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca; elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca; randall.garrison@parl.gc.ca; Wendy Mesley <marketplace@cbc.ca>

Subject: CBC’s Marketplace episode on cellular phones

Dear Mr. Singer,

Thank you for your response, with which I have major concerns.

Can you please show me any tests that confirm that exposure to RF energy, on a continuous basis (24/7/365) from a cellphone and/or any similar wireless device, would be safe for a child? I assume you must have access to many such reports or you wouldn’t provide this assurance to the public.

May I ask if you and Health Canada are familiar with the report by the National Toxicology Program in the US, a 10 year, $25 million test which resulted in tumors in the brain (gliomas) and heart (schwannomas) in rats exposed to low levels of RF radiation for 10 minute intervals?  The report, “Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD Rats (Whole Body Exposure),” is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/055699.

This test has been lauded by experts, even the American Cancer Society which has been slow to accept other scientific warnings regarding wireless radiation, who say that this test is extremely well done and a “game changer”.  If you are familiar with it, it seems inconsistent that you should continue to reassure parents that their children will suffer no consequences from constant and continued exposure to cell phones or any other wireless gadget.

This is one of many thousands of high quality studies that show serious health effects from prolonged (although not constant) exposure to even low levels of RF radiation. Again, Mr. Singer, can you show me the studies upon which you rely that show that there is no harm from constant, continual exposure, especially for children?

I do appreciate your response, and I ask that you consider my comments.  I look forward to yours.  This issue is too important for parents (and the general public) to be mis-informed. They deserve to know the full details, including the scientific warnings raised by independent researchers, before exposing their children to such risks.

Sharon Noble
Victoria, BC


From:  Norbert Duerichen  (name given with permission)
: Singer, Tim (HC/SC) <tim.singer@canada.ca>
Sent: June 14, 2017 5:53 PM

Subject: Re: CBC’s Marketplace episode on cellular phones

Hello Tim Singer,

Thank you for your reply.

There is one matter regarding mobile phones that I ponder over and that I would like clarified.

As you are probably aware, there are guidelines for the use of mobile phones given within the system of the device that we are discovering are not extensively known to the users because they tend not to seek out these guidelines and often do not know that they have been formulated by the manufacturers.  I wish to understand the legal implications when a user fails to apply the device according to those guidelines.  For example, in the case of a user incurring a brain tumour, is the manufacturer exempt from liability when it is found that the complainant failed to abide by these given guidelines?  Has Health Canada sought legal counsel to clarify this, thereby being capable to properly advise the public?  Furthermore, what is Health Canada’s legal position on this matter?  Would a failure to take reasonable initiatives to notify the public put Health Canada into a compromised position?

Thank you,
Norbert Duerichen


Dear Mr. Singer,

I appreciate your reply, but must take issue with your statement that “The original purpose of this statement was to clarify that Safety Code 6 provides protection for all age groups.”  Safety Code 6 as it presently stands is nothing more than a repeat of guidelines originally created by the wireless industry and their lobbyists, specifically designed to ignore the DNA damaging non-thermal biological effects that have been known for decades by those in industry and the military who have actually researched such effects.

How is it that Health Canada seems to be still ignorant of the fact that exposure to microwaves at much lower levels than Safety Code 6 limits have indeed caused many health problems (leukemia, cancer, etc.)?  Relying on outdated guidelines which only consider THERMAL effects does not provide ANY protection to anyone, especially young children, from the NON-THERMAL BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS that currently threaten the health of most humans today (according to the most recent scientific knowledge and published studies on the subject of non-thermal biological effects).

Bathing the Canadian public in ever-increasing amounts of pulsed microwaves from wireless devices (cell phones, smart meters, smart TV, baby monitors, etc.) WILL CAUSE, and has already caused negative health effects to many Canadians, most of them totally unaware of the real dangers because of inaccurate statements from Health Canada and others just mindlessly regurgitating the same old misrepresentations promoted by the wireless industry so as not to impact their multibillion dollar profit strategies.

In my opinion, it’s about time that Health Canada actually used real evidence from the many experts who have researched the most recent studies of non-thermal biological effects of wireless radiation exposure, instead of excluding such studies from the “weight of evidence” used by the last panel formed to revise Safety Code 6.  Once you understand what these researchers have tried to bring to light for decades, then it should be the responsibility of Health Canada to thoroughly revise Safety Code 6 to include protection from such damaging exposure.  Making any more public statements as to how safe everything wireless is imagined to be does nothing other than ignore the truth.

The wireless device manufacturers all realize the damage being done, and know the costs of existing and future health damage litigation may bankrupt them once the “secret” they have tried to cover up for so many years becomes widely known.  They know how wireless microwave radiation affects the blood-brain barrier causing leakage, they know the negative impact on healthy sperm and ova, they know their devices cause the increase in EHS, they know that brain glioma increases with cell phone use.

Why does Health Canada not seem to have any knowledge of these dangers?  Your statement “although the scientific evidence does not support the need for limits that are more restrictive than Safety Code 6” can only hold true by totally ignoring the scientific evidence readily available from a simple web search on “wireless DNA damage”.

Perhaps no one at Health Canada really wants to protect public health from what some experts call “the biggest threat to humanity” (EMF exposure) in the world today?  I certainly hope this not to be the case.

Please ensure the Honourable Jane Philpott, Minister of Health, is advised of my concerns.

Yours truly,


From: Jerry Flynn
Sent: June 10, 2017 3:36 PM
To: fifthtips@cbc.ca

Subject: FW: Corruption in Your Government Forces Canada’s Entire Population to be Guinea Pigs in the Largest Uncontrolled Science Experiment in Human History!

Dear 5th Estate,   [http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/]

I’ve just sent this to each of the current federal government health committee (HESA) members. Although this is an international story, my focus has been on the corruption in the government of Canada and its effects on all of us – including each/all of you there at the 5th Estate.

Jerry Flynn

—–Original Message—–

From: Jerry Flynn
Sent: June 10, 2017 1:42 PM
To: Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca; Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca; Don.Davies@parl.gc.ca; Ramaz.Ayoub@parl.gc.ca; Colin.Carrie@parl.gc.ca; Doug.Eyolfson@parl.gc.ca; Rachel.Harder@parl.gc.ca; Darshan.Kang@parl.gc.ca; John.Oliver@parl.gc.ca; Sonia.Sidhu@parl.gc.ca

Subject: Corruption in Your Government Forces Canada’s Entire Population to be Guinea Pigs in the Largest Uncontrolled Science Experiment in Human History!

Ask yourself just one question: If, in 2011, the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly (representing 47 countries, 820-million people) urged all its member nations to apply the ‘Precautionary Principle’ and/or adopt the ‘ALARA principle’ (as low as reasonably achievable), and more than 20 countries, including Russia, China and India, plus many individual U.S. states have taken similar action to protect their citizens – especially children, pregnant women, children in school and all future generations – from the hazardous non-thermal electro-magnetic field radiation (produced by overhead power transmission lines, distribution lines, substations, ‘smart’ meters, household electricity, electrical appliances, ‘smart’ appliances, cell phones, cordless phones, cell phone towers, Wi-Fi routers, tablet and laptop computers, Bluetooth, GPS, radars {including vehicular “collision-avoidance’ systems, etc.}), why has Health Canada still done nothing to protect us and our children?

My Registered Letter to the Prime Minister (see below) answers the question posed above. Once again Canadians have been abandoned by Health Canada’s Radiation Protection Bureau and their colleagues in Innovation Science and Economic Development (think tobacco, asbestos, Thalidomide, leaded gasoline).

= = =

June 9, 2017

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
via Registered Letter
Office of the Prime Minister
80 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON
K1A 0A2

Dear Prime Minister Trudeau,

Corruption in Your Government Forces Canada’s Entire Population to be Guinea Pigs in the Largest Uncontrolled Science Experiment in Human History!

Health Canada (HC) and Innovation, Science and Economic Development (ISED) are inextricably enmeshed (and have been for decades) in the corrupt U.S.’ Military-Industrial Complex (MIC), which recognizes only the thermal effects of microwave radiation. (See Appendix, para. 1.) Like all MIC members, HC refuses to recognize / admit that the low-intensity, non-thermal effects of microwave radiation can be hazardous to humans and all life forms. For that reason, we are all being whole-body irradiated – for the rest of our lives – by “low-intensity, pulsed, non-thermal radiation” emitted by ‘smart’ meters, cellular phones, cordless phones, cell phone towers, Wi-Fi routers, Bluetooth, power transmission and distribution lines, substations, household 60 Hz electricity and appliances, ‘smart’ appliances, computers, Wi-Fi and Wi-MAX zones, full-body scanners, police and municipal communication systems, radars (including vehicle collision avoidance systems), etc. (See App. para. 2.) [1] This is in clear violation of the Nuremburg Code! (See App. para. 3.) Leading scientists see a parallel between the explosion in EMFs around the world and the explosion in today‘s disease epidemics, e.g., autism, cancers, ADHD, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, ALS and other diseases of the brain, central nervous system and immune system.

HC’s Industry-Friendly Safety Code 6.

a. Fails to recognize/admit that non-thermal radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic (EMF) radiation is harmful to humans and other living things. This enables electric utilities and wireless and telecom companies to utilize and/or sell hazardous wireless products / devices to an unsuspecting, trusting and defenseless public! (See App. para 4.)

b. Because of the above, SC6 fails to protect humans and other living things against the known hazards of non-thermal effects of RF EMF on frequencies 100 kHz to 300 GHz – which is precisely where today‘s wireless products / devices emit their invisible but hazardous non-thermal radiation!

c. Fails to protect humans and other living things from the known hazards of extremely low frequency (ELF) or ‘powerline 60 Hz.’ EMFs. This saves electric power utilities literally billions of dollars but causes great harm to an unsuspecting and defenseless public. (See App. para 5.)

HC stubbornly fails to invoke the ‘Precautionary Principle’ to protect the general population against man-made ELF and/or RF EMFs. This indefensibly callous stance enables electric utilities and wireless and telecom companies to continue doing “business as usual” without having to worry about law suits. (See App. para 6; para 7 lists instances when the Precautionary Principle should have been imposed.)

HC stubbornly refuses to admit that there is such a thing as ‘electromagnetic hypersensitivity’ or “EHS”, which is attributed to man-made ELF and/or RF EMFs. Consequently, HC also fails to provide those suffering from EHS with any protection against it! (See App. para 8.)

ISED (formerly Industry Canada). Unbelievably, it allows electric power utilities and wireless and telecom companies to operate their technologies on what militaries have known for decades are the most dangerous frequencies known to humans: 1-5 GHz (one billion to five billion Hertz). These frequencies are known to “penetrate all organ systems of the body thus putting all organ systems at risk!” (See App. para 9) [2]

Mainstream News Media. Today‘s ever-shrinking media ownership in North America contributes greatly to what is Canada’s (indeed, the world’s) worst-ever, and still growing, environmental crisis! Just a handful of conglomerates own and/or control what people see on TV, hear on the radio and read in newspapers. It is no wonder that the public doesn’t realize the power and influence Industry has over governments today! (See App. para 10.)

My BIO (see App. para 11.)

Mr. Prime Minister, these are unthinkably evil times in Canada’s (the world’s) history – even you, personally, and members of your own family are at risk!  The evidence is overwhelming and irrefutable that HC and ISED, aided and abetted by a largely silent mainstream news media, are deliberately deceiving you, your government and the general public (as they have done for decades) about the purported ‘safety’ of man-made wireless technologies, all of which emit hazardous ELF and/or RF non-thermal EMF radiation! Canada (indeed, the world) urgently needs new and ‘orders of magnitude’ lower ‘safe’ exposure limits in order to protect humans and every form of life from ELF and RF EMF radiation. Although, scientists today know more about EMFs than did their predecessors about the hazards of cigarette smoke, asbestos fibres or DDT, the unprecedented power and influence of ‘Industry’ today is such that governments and the public in North America continue to believe that wireless is safe! [3]

Respectfully, Mr. Prime Minister, on behalf of all Canadians, I urge you to immediately:
1) direct your Minister of Health to invoke the Precautionary Principle on all wireless technologies, nationwide;
2) direct the RCMP to immediately conduct an exhaustive criminal investigation, not just of HC’s Radiation Protection Bureau, but of their colleagues in ISED, and of the entire EMF community nationwide; and,
3) seek the counsel of independent EMF experts, such as ICEMS (International Commission for Electromagnetic Safety)
[4] and/or the authors of the BioInitiative 2012 Report [5].
Other national leaders will undoubtedly follow your example, which will finally expose the ongoing pandemic corruption within the WHO, ICNIRP, ICES and the FCC, all of whom must be held criminally responsible for their unthinkably heartless and evil actions!

J.G. (“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (Retired)

[1] https://www.qigonginstitute.org/category/11/electromagnetic-pollution

[2] http://www.assassinationscience.com/EMP5.htm

[3] http://www.bioinitiative.org/conclusions/

[4] http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/resolutions-and-appeals/

[5] http://www.bioinitiative.org/

Appendix [App.]


Sharon Noble
Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“The greater the power, the more dangerous the abuse”
~ Edmund Burke

Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation