2017-04-04 More than 80 cities in Ohio suing re small cells

[Brain Tumours – Cancer Registry – Cell Phones – Doctor Alexander Lerchl – EHS – EMF – Harald Banzhaff – Health Canada HESA – ICNIRP – Jane PhilpottJenny Roller-SpooJustin TrudeauLennart HardellMario Babilon – Microwave Radiation Studies – Precautionary Principle – SB331 Small Cell / Microcell Public Right of Way Siting Lawsuit – WLAN Wireless Local Area Network | BC – Canada – Stuttgart, Germany – Massachusetts & Ohio, USA]

1)    Many people are suffering from brain cancer but only well-known ones usually become known to those of us trying to track them. If you know of anyone who is suffering or suffered from this horrible disease, please let me know. It also would be most helpful to know the type of tumour.

A Massachusetts State Senator just died from brain cancer.

(click on photos to enlarge)


2)    More than 80 towns and cities in Ohio have started legal action against the State Bill which would allow small/microcells to be placed and installed on public right of way without notification or regulation by the local government. Cleveland is the only major city yet to join. The cost sharing of the legal costs has been set based on size of the community. I wish some town or city in BC would take the lead on similar action here.


3)    From Germany, a documentary about EHS that, unfortunately, has interviews that cannot be translated but the article has been.  I have asked someone who is fluent in German to listen to Lerchl’s interview and to summarize anything significant.

GERMANY: Cell Phone Sickness?
A Documentary on EHS shown on ZDF’s Planet-e.
April 2, 2017 (In German.)

Features the accounts of Dr. Mario Babilon, a physicist and computer scientist, and a 15 year-old high school student.

“Mario Babilon feels the health effects of electrosmog on his own. The account the hardships faced by the Stuttgart-based professor of computer science begins more than ten years ago. At that time, he suffered severe headaches, particularly after long meetings. For the physicist, an odyssey began of going from doctor to doctor; no one could help.

“A newspaper article first introduced Babilon to the idea that it could be EHS and a reaction to the newly installed WLAN network in the meeting rooms. The scientist did not want to believe this at first, but soon he realized: without WLAN networks in his environment, he is much better. The computer science professor is not a unique case. According to a report by the Federal Ministry of the Environment to the German Bundestag, around one million people in Germany consider themselves to be electrosensitive.”

(Based on a translation by Google. Please pardon translation errors.)

Original article: https://www.zdf.de/dokumentation/planet-e/planet-e-krankmacher-handy-100.html

Google translation: http://bit.ly/2ozaOKh

4)    A summary of science evidence re. microwave radiation written in 2011. Some excellent reference material, although many more significant studies have occurred since, many showing the mechanisms.

Summary. In this review we discuss alarming epidemiological and experimental data on possible carcinogenic effects of long term exposure to low intensity microwave (MW) radiation. Recently, a number of reports revealed that under certain conditions the irradiation by low intensity MW can substantially induce cancer progression in humans and in animal models. The carcinogenic effect of MW irradiation is typically manifested after long term (up to 10 years and more) exposure. Nevertheless, even a year of operation of a powerful base transmitting station for mobile communication reportedly resulted in a dramatic increase of cancer incidence among population living nearby. In addition, model studies in rodents unveiled a significant increase in carcinogenesis after 17-24 months of MW exposure both in tumor-prone and intact animals. To that, such metabolic changes, as overproduction of reactive oxygen species, 8‑hydroxi-2-deoxyguanosine formation, or ornithine decarboxylase activation under exposure to low intensity MW confirm a stress impact of this factor on living cells. We also address the issue of standards for assessment of biological effects of irradiation. It is now becoming increasingly evident that assessment of biological effects of non-ionizing radiation based on physical (thermal) approach used in recommendations of current regulatory bodies, including the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines, requires urgent reevaluation. We conclude that recent data strongly point to the need for re-elaboration of the current safety limits for non-ionizing radiation using recently obtained knowledge. We also emphasize that the everyday exposure of both occupational and general public to MW radiation should be regulated based on a precautionary principles which imply maximum restriction of excessive exposure.



From: X
Sent: April 3, 2017
To: Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca
Cc: justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca

Subject: Registry Re Cancer

Dear Minister Philpott

Regarding the health dangers of EMF, especially to young children, can your ministry, which is charged with the responsibility of protecting the health of Canadians,  as a minimumimplement the recommendations made by HESA in 2010 and 2015 to start and maintain a cancer registry?

Your government was elected on evidence based policy yet your ministry refuses to collect the evidence that would provide the basis of a policy to protect Canadians’ health.  Why?  Is it because corporate business interests, not the health of Canadians, is the priority.  Your ministry needs an overhaul, Minister.  Are you up to the job?





Sharon Noble
Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity.”   
~ Albert Einstein

Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation