1) In Australia, groups are having presentations to educate people about EHS. The link below shows topics that will be covered, including legal aspects.
https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/EHS-Australian-Law-2016AUG19.jpg
2) Dr. Erika Mallery Blythe speaks at the UK College of Naturopathic Medicine June 7, 2016: Electromagnetic Radiation: A Modern Health Challenge. 4 Parts. There is a mounting scientific debate regarding the safety of existing exposure limits and scope of possible related illness. Each part is about 28 minutes long and I found the first 2 very interesting. At about the 19 min. point of Part 2, she discusses EHS and explains the variety of symptoms. As the other 2 parts become available, I will share.
https://archive.org/details/ABOUTSMARTMETERS59
or
http://www.wccatv.com/video/about-smart-meters/ABOUTSMARTMETERS59 Part 1
https://archive.org/details/ABOUTSMARTMETERS60 Part 2
3) More about EHS which is becoming a problem for many people. I get emails every day from people who have become sensitive and are confronted by a world that is polluted by wireless radiation. It is becoming nearly impossible to escape. It is vitally important to reduce exposure to microwave radiation and strong chemicals to prevent EHS. (Easier said than done.) Many people are having to move to rural areas where wireless exposure is reduced, and some are being forced to live without electricity at all.
“This paper constructs persons with environmental sensitivities as comprising a hidden, marginalized group in technological culture that is paying a large price for our industrialized lifestyle. Due to the polluted nature of most public venues, this population is robbed of a sense of ‘‘place’’ necessary to maintain personal relationships. This population is marginalized by health-care providers and shunted into mental health categories, as our current health paradigms are not adequate to frame and categorize health problems caused by our toxic industrial lifestyle…
The life impacts of having sensitivities include extrusion from one’s occupation, damaged social relations (Gibson, 2015;Gibson et al., 1996), delegitimization (Gibson, 1997), and even homelessness. Most poignant, perhaps, is the loss of place.”
http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/eco.2016.0003
4) Instead of the next segment of comments to the BCUC draft response to my complaint about smart meters, below are comments about the class action. Please share. Also, for now, please do not send in registrations or donations for legal costs.
Comments about Judge Adair’s decision not to certify the class action:
Nobody has ever said that the challenge of bringing public accountability to BC Hydro would be easy, but significant and encouraging steps have been realized despite the court’s refusal of the application for class action certification of a civil lawsuit against BC Hydro.
Of greatest importance is that the foundational argument of the case survived the attack by BC Hydro, and the court found merit and plausibility in the success of a cause of action which embodied the Charter of Rights, Section 7 Liberty Interest. In short, the court recognized that the right to be free from government interference regarding choices of a fundamental and personal nature within one’s home was a valid argument. Now that’s a success that we would not have achieved without this class action application.
The court’s recognition of the Section 7 Liberty Interest as it relates to forced smart meter application and unacceptable microwave radiation emissions exposure therefrom is a major development and a big step up the stairway to success.
Where this court application for class action certification failed is in the identification of a common class. There are several main reasons which cause concern over smart meter installation – health damage, health concerns, fire risk, security & surveillance and billing concerns account for the majority of varied reasons which could give rise to a resident refusing a smart meter. Given that the court was analyzing the viability of the class action procedures, not the merits of the case, it is clear that the next action would be one where the class of persons would need to be narrowed so that there was a common issue within the group.
Since the court has affirmed the viability of a Section 7 Liberty Interest cause of action, now is the time to analyze how to use this valuable court decision as a relevant legal landmark upon which a refined case can be brought against BC Hydro.
It is also important to note that the decision did not assert that the microwave radiation emissions from smart meters is safe, and since the Notice of Civil Claim against BC Hydro was filed in 2013, recent credible science is reporting the possibility of devastating ill health effects from wireless exposure. Unfortunately, scientific articles which would have further supported health concerns were released after the court had closed submissions. Check out the US National Toxicology Program science article on brain and heart cancers from two years intermittent “cell phone” exposure. (http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/05/26/055699)
BC Hydro asserts that the Clean Energy Act allows them to act with impunity even though its actions and the roll out of the smart meter program violates our fundamental principles of a democratic society. We know that the Charter protection afforded to every individual in BC is activated when members of the public are being subjected to undemocratic and oppressive tactics of a governmental agency, and BC Hydro is not excluded from the responsibility to abide by the Charter of Rights. While we disagree with certain statements made in the court decision, we are thankful for the recognition of the validity of the Charter Section 7 Liberty Interest argument, and now continue to seek redress as we move ahead.
This decision has opened the way for individual civil claims against BC Hydro under the Charter Section 7 Liberty Interest. There can be as many individual claims as people feel their rights have been frustrated. Any customer of BC Hydro who is interested in pursuing civil action against BC Hydro is encouraged to take this Supreme Court Decision to a lawyer versed in constitutional law for an opinion on the merits of their individual situation. We would like to hear from anyone who receives legal advice affirming their case against BC Hydro under Section 7 of the Charter.
Una St. Clair Sharon Noble
Executive Director, Director,
Citizens for Safe Technology Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
Sharon Noble
Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“Get up, stand up, stand up for your rights. Get up, stand up, don’t give up the fight.”
~ Bob Marley