1) A reminder that tomorrow, Dr. Marc Arazi and I will be presenting information about the cell phone scandals in France and Canada. There is a lot of information that ANSES and Health Canada, as well as the telecoms, don’t want you to know. Complete info about the ‘meeting’ is at the link.
C4ST Open Pubic Meeting — All welcome. Please distribute
Tuesday March 28, 2023
7:30 pm EDT, 4:30 pm PDT, (00.:30 in France)
Hosted by Shelley Wright and Marg Friesen
2) In the March 23 update, I shared this important recently published paper “Wireless Technologies, Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Fields and Children: Identifying and Reducing Health Risks”. Below is a press release summarizing the paper. Please consider sharing widely, especially to parents, teachers and physicians.
SCIENTIFIC PAPER ON CHILDREN, WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, AND HEALTH EFFECTS BY RENOWNED EXPERTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
“A state-of-the-art assessment on the scientific evidence of wireless radiation impacts on children’s health published in the journal Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care concludes that the medical community has a critical role to play to prevent harm from wireless radiation. “Wireless Technologies, Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Fields and Children: Identifying and Reducing Health Risks” is written by distinguished experts in medicine, epidemiology, toxicology, physics, biochemical engineering and public health who collectively have published more than 1,000 papers.”
3) From Joel Moskowitz as an introduction to the paper below. There are many other studies and reports on 5G at:
Biological and Health Effects of 5G
There has been little research on the biologic or health effects of 5G. According to EMF-Portal, an archive that contains more than 38,000 publications on electromagnetic fields, of the 519 studies on 5G, only 14 have been medical/biological studies (as of March 27, 2023). A closer look, however, reveals that although these 14 studies employed carrier frequencies used in 5G, only four studies modulated or pulsed the signal as required by 5G and used other features of 5G (e.g., beamforming, massive MIMO, and phased arrays) that are likely to affect the nature and extent of biological or health effects from exposure to this radiation (Hardell and Nilsson, 2023; Chu et al., 2023; Pustake et al., 2022; Perov et al., 2022).
5G Wireless Technology: Is 5G Harmful to Our Health?
(click on photos to enlarge)
ICNIRP Guidelines’ Exposure Assessment Method for 5G Millimetre Wave Radiation May Trigger Adverse Effects
“The current global roll-out of 5G infrastructure is designed to utilise millimetre wave (mmW) frequencies (30–300 GHz range) at data transmission rates in the order of gigabits per second (Gbps). This frequency band will be transmitted using beamforming, a new introduction in near-field exposures. The International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) has recently updated their guidelines. We briefly examine whether the new approach of the ICNIRP is satisfactory to prevent heat damage and other adverse bio-effects once millimetre wave 5G is included,..,
Once the 5G mmW band is internationally operational, a significant proportion of the world’s population will be exposed to new hazards. The intensity and complexity of near-field exposure, such as when carrying a phone in a pocket or using it next to the head, will be different for 5G, and this is the first time mmW have been used for public telecommunications and the first time beamforming has been deliberately introduced for near-field use. Without research on the impact of near-field 5G, this global step is an experiment at the population level. Bearing this in mind, there is a vital and urgent need for targeted research and for a re-evaluation of the scientific relevance of the current RF human exposure standards’ basic approach and assumptions.”
4) For members in the USA, please see a request in Letters.
From: Theodora Scarato <email@example.com>
Call Out To All Those Working On Safe Tech With US Congressional Rep
Please email us at EHT regarding federal officials that are receptive to safe tech issues. Please also send letters or communications where constituents have been told that the FCC and/or FDA are ensuring safety. (Thanks to those who already did)
Please let us know what federal representatives you are engaging with that are receptive as we have a critical effort to address the US shortcomings.
In addition please join our campaign here. Send a letter to your representative , Forward us any responses of note.
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters/Citizens for Safer Tech
“A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” Winston Churchill
Sent from my wired laptop with no wireless components. Practice Safe Tech.