1) Yet another article about how 5G is not delivering what telecoms have promised. This is getting to be hackneyed, so why is ISED still pushing 5G by auctioning off more mmWave spectrum? Could this be to get money while they can, before all the telecoms realize this isn’t going to succeed?
(click on photo to enlarge)
5G Hype Simply Didn’t Deliver
“We’ve noted for several years how the “race to 5G” was largely just hype by telecoms and hardware vendors eager to sell more gear and justify high U.S. mobile data prices. While 5G does provide faster, more resilient, and lower latency networks, it’s more of an evolution than a revolution.
But that’s not what telecom giants like Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T promised. Both routinely promised that 5G would change the way we live and work, usher forth the smart cities of tomorrow, and even revolutionize the way we treat cancer. None of those things wound up being true.”
2) It would be very beneficial if anyone has sought relief from EHS via acupuncture would share their experiences and their reactions by sending to me at: firstname.lastname@example.org with “EHS acupuncture” on the subject line. Tell me if I can share in an update with or without your name.
5G/EMF/RF Acupuncture, “EMF Sensitivity,” and “The Law of Midday/Midnight”
“This is part 3 of on-going series discussing electric field sensitivity (EHS) from the perspective of Chinese Medicine. “The “point’ of acupuncture is harmonization between the inner and outer environment.”…
The ancient reverential indigenous and Eastern cultures observed the world and learned directly from the Laws of Nature. In the present day, many laws and regulations are fueled by increasing fear, arrogance, entitlement, and greed. And lying.
The mainstream Western medical model does not yet understand the interrelationships between the differing organs, the electromagnetic energies that nurture all of life, or the dynamic balance between humanity and the cosmos. We can change this. We can leapfrog beyond restraining cultural judgments. This is one ‘cure’ for existential climate terror.”
3) Dr. Joel Moskowitz has collected and shares 1,000s of studies and provides short summaries/abstracts. One note about one of the recent studies listed.
Carcinogenesis from chronic exposure to radio-frequency radiation
James C. Lin. Carcinogenesis from chronic exposure to radio-frequency radiation. Front. Public Health, Sec. Radiation and Health. 31 October 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1042478.
To quote Dr. Lin:
“Off-the-shelf cellphones have SAR ranging from 0.2 and 0.5 W/kg (15). The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) rules require that they do not exceed the SAR limit of 1.6 W/kg for cellphones operating at its highest possible power level. Clearly, cellphones are operating at a fraction of the SAR acceptable to FCC and they are well below (e.g., only 10%) the 2.0 W/kg promulgated by ICES and ICNIRP.”
Dr. Lin’s source (15) is very questionable and has provided incorrect information which has been refuted by Dr. Marc Arazi (Phonegate), Sam Roe (Chicago Tribune) and Dr. Om Gandhi, as well as by the information I gathered from ISED. Many of the cell phones tested independently, as well as those tested by ISED, failed to comply with the 1.6W/kg SAR limit, often by many times. In fact, some of the phones with the highest SAR levels are Samsung, which are promoted by this source.
I have written to Dr. Moskowitz suggesting that Dr. Lin be asked why he used the source he did — EMF Academy. https://emfacademy.com/lowest-radiation-cell-phones/ which seems to be eager to sell dubious products while providing some education. This website is not credible and by using it as a reference, Dr. Lin’s report loses credibility, IMHO.
Recent Research on Wireless Radiation and Electromagnetic Fields
“I have been circulating abstracts of newly-published scientific papers on radio frequency and other non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) about once a month since 2016. Several hundred EMF scientists around the world receive these updates.
The complete collection contains more than 1,700 abstracts and links to more than 1,800 papers….
The abstracts for the most recent papers appear below.”
4) Arthur Firstenberg asks you to join his campaign and sign a pledge, whether you have or cell phone or not.
NO CELL PHONE! Campaign Launched Worldwide Today, November 3, 2022
“Wireless technology is also the first pollutant for which there is not a dose response: the effect does not depend on the dose. Reducing the power level of a wireless device does not reduce the harm that it causes. For purposes of health and environment, a cell phone is a cell tower. We cannot have birds and insects and also have cell phones. Our children will not live to grow up if we do not get rid of cell phones.
The benefits of ridding one’s life of cell phones — the restoration of your health and vitality — are immediate, startling, and far greater than the benefits that they provide. And as this action spreads, so will the benefits. A restored vitality of the forests, oceans, wildlife and birds that once gave life meaning will give people much more than they will give up when they throw away their cell phones — and gladly give up, once they feel the difference and realize what they have traded away.
We ask you to join in pledging to do your part in putting an end to the greatest, most urgent, most ignored assault on the Earth that there is. To plant a seed that will be watered, grow, and proliferate. No one — not legislators, not judges, not corporate CEOs — can do it for us”
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters/Citizens for Safer Tech
“It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop.” Confucius
Sent from my wired laptop with no wireless components.