2022-04-29 5G Science explained

1) You can replace the FDA and FCC with Health Canada and ISED in about every “myth”. There is an excellent 26 min. video that is worth watching and sharing:

Wireless Radiation Regulatory Gap Health Effects Unregulated.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhb5i_LdUxE

Myth: The Food And Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed the science on 5G and cell towers and determined the radiation is safe.
Myth: ….Additionally, the FDA’s doctors, scientists and engineers monitor the scientific studies and public health data for evidence that radiofrequency energy from cell phones could cause adverse health effects. There is no consistent or credible scientific evidence of health problems caused by the exposure to radiofrequency energy emitted by cell phones….

Fact: The FDA has never evaluated the totality of the science to conclude any opinion on the safety of human exposure to 5G technology or cell tower radiation. All the FDA has done is to release a now outdated literature review (ending in 2018) focused solely only on cell phones and cancer. This literature review omits studies on damage to DNA, the brain and reproduction. The FDA literature review is not a systematic review nor is it a risk analysis nor is it an evaluation of FCC cell tower radiation limits, despite being presented in this way.”

https://www.activistpost.com/2022/04/fda-director-the-fda-does-not-regulate-cell-towers-or-cell-tower-radiation-and-has-no-studies-or-information-on-cell-towers.html

Letter from FDA which is virtually word for word what Health Canada, the Cancer Society, and ISED have on their websites and have told people concerned enough to ask for information:

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/FCC_FDA-Communications-FCC-Lawyer-and-Mother-on-Cell-Tower-Radiation-.pdf

2) There is a lot of confusion about 5G and how it differs from 2G, 3G, and 4G. The Physicians for Safe Technology have provided great explanations about the technology and the risks associated with 5G. This is a great piece to keep as reference.

5G Telecommunications Science

“Military uses have also been discussed. This 5th generation (5G) system will add high frequency electromagnetic radiation with Gigahertz (GHz) wavelengths in the millimeter range utilizing beam steering technology, along with low and mid band frequencies used n 2G, 3G and 4G communications. These high frequency tiny wavelengths penetrate only the outer layer of the skin, unlike 2G, 3G and 4G technology which passes through the body. Major health concerns with exposure to 5G are to skin, eye and adverse systemic metabolic signaling through skin sensors, as well as heat effects. In a the March 2020 European Parliament Briefing on health effects of 5G they admit that the “European Commission has not yet conducted studies on the potential health risks of the 5G technology.””

5G Telecommunications Science

https://mdsafetech.org/5g-telecommunications-science/

3) A couple of years ago, there was an item about people (in Sweden I believe) who had microchips in their hands to identify them at their offices, to open security doors, etc. Now to replace credit cards??

BBC Lauds Implantable Microchip “Wallet”

“This is totally normal. The BBC reporting on people getting implanted with microchips in their arms in order to buy things.

The article reads like an advert for the company Walletmor, which is offering to put the chips literally in people’s hands for just $300.”

https://www.activistpost.com/2022/04/bbc-lauds-implantable-microchip-wallet.html

https://emrabc.ca/?s=rfid

 

Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them.”    Isaac Asimov

http://stopsmartmetersbc.com/

 

 

Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation