2022-03-16 Telus asking for customer help with 5G

1) People are complaining about the brightness of the new LED lights which makes it impossible to sleep. This brightness could reduce the amount of melatonin being produced. Of equal concern is the potential/likelihood that these new lights or their fixtures could hold a microcell antenna required for 5G. These are being planned for all parts of BC. I hope people will bring this to their city councils and demand normal lights without any 5G antenna.

(click on photos to enlarge)

https://www.castanetkamloops.net/news/Kamloops/362863/Residents_say_BC_Hydros_new_LED_lights_cast_too_harsh_a_light

LED streetlight too bright?

“In a statement to Castanet Kamloops, a BC Hydro spokesperson said the company owns and maintains over 90,000 streetlights province-wide, and over the next two to three years, plans are in place to replace them all with energy-efficient LEDs.

BC Hydro said this program hasn’t been rolled out in Kamloops yet, but there have been approximately 300 LED lights installed in the city where old ones have burned out.”

https://www.castanetkamloops.net/news/Kamloops/362863/Residents_say_BC_Hydros_new_LED_lights_cast_too_harsh_a_light

2) I think I shared something about this a while back but given the item above I thought it appropriate to share this article about 5G transmitters on street lights.

AT&T is deploying streetlight-powered 5G small cells

“… one of the biggest challenges in deploying new network infrastructure is the time it takes to acquire sites, engineer designs and secure permits, noting that it can often take between 12 to 18 months to get a new site installed.

By incorporating 5G radios into streetlights operators can significantly reduce that time. Streetlights already have electricity and they are often in close proximity to fiber for backhaul. Plus, they are the perfect height for a small cell because they are typically 8 to 10 meters high and they are spaced about 50 meters apart. In addition, most streetlights have a common electric socket, known as the ANSI C136 (or NEMA) socket.”

https://www.fiercewireless.com/5g/att-deploying-streetlight-powered-5g-small-cells

3) This is very bizarre and perhaps indicative of Telus meeting resistance to 5G. Telus is asking for a customer support of their money-making spread of 5G by signing a petition to an MP asking the MP to ensure Telus gets its share of 5G spectrum. Read the letter you’re being asked to sign.

This calls for a counter action — a petition to our MPs demanding wired access, preferably fiber optic cable. Anyone willing to write one? If so, let me know at: citizensforsafertech@shaw.ca

You can help bring 5G benefits to all Canadians

“Communities with access to high speed networks will see new economic potential, better access to education and healthcare, and increased appeal for new citizens and businesses. But for all that to happen, we need policies in place that allow all Canadians to seize these opportunities.

If Canada gets 5G spectrum allocation right, connecting rural, remote, northern, and Indigenous communities can happen much faster.

All Canadians deserve connectivity – with your support, we can do it.

Add your name
Sign the letter below to tell your local Member of Parliament that all Canadians deserve to benefit from 5G. It’s never been more important.”

https://www.telus.com/en/social-impact/connecting-canada/take-action/true-value?cmp=SOC_Telus_PA_Facebook_CCFG-March_TakeAction_EN_Q1_2022

4) Below is another fabulous letter by Marcus Schluschen to the Qualicum Beach City Council. In most cases, I suspect, the telecom is not forthcoming with true and accurate information. If it were, more people would refuse to allow a cell tower to be put on land near their homes, schools, hospitals, etc. And, I bet, more people would refuse to accept money for leasing property to a company that conducts business like this.

Letter:

https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/5G-Cell-Tower-Protest-6-Qualicum-Beach-BC-September-26-2020.jpg

From: Marcus Schluschen (name given with permission)
Date: March 14, 2022
Subject: Telus Cell Tower – EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016
To: <bwiese@qualicumbeach.com>, <askipsey@qualicumbeach.com>, <twestbroek@qualicumbeach.com>, <rfilmer@qualicumbeach.com>, <sharrison@qualicumbeach.com>
Cc: Carol Dowe <caroldowe@gmail.com>

Re: Europeam EMF Guideline – Telus cell tower

Dear Mayor Wiese, and members of QB Council,

I appreciate that I was given the opportunity to speak at this morning’s Zoom meeting.

The medical document I referred to is called:
EUROPEAM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF – related health problems and illnesses

It is imperative, that all members of Council, familiarize themselves with this important medical document.

Unfortunately, Telus’s lobbyist, Brian Gregg, failed to provide you, the Council of Qualicum Beach, as well as the residents, the opportunity to learn about the many serious health implications, as outlined in this medical paper, which was published in 2016.

In the absence of full public disclosure of health related issues, arising from biologically active, pulsed, microwave radiation, emitted by the proposed Telus cell tower, there is NO INFORMED CONSENT by Council, nor residents of Qualicum Beach.

In my profession as a certified, EMF consultant, who has spoken to hundreds of people, I have yet to meet anyone who is knowledgeable regarding the biological health effects of RF microwave radiation, as it is invisible like a virus.

Once they learn, that humans and all life interacts at minute frequencies, as well as tiny electrical signals, they begin to understand, that our health will be negatively impacted by any increase in radiation levels.

In the EMF GUIDELINE you will learn not only about cancer, but also host of other health issues, from serious cardiac to neurological problems.

EUROPAEM_EMF_Guideline_2016_English_Original.pdf

https://europaem.eu/attachments/article/124/EUROPAEM_EMF_Guideline_2016_English_Original.pdf

European Academy for Environmental Medicine (EUROPAEM) – EMF working group:

Igor Belyaev, Amy Dean, Horst Eger, Gerhard Hubmann, Reinhold Jandrisovits, Markus Kern, Michael Kundi, Hanns Moshammer, Piero Lercher, Kurt Müller, Gerd Oberfeld*, Peter Ohnsorge, Peter Pelzmann, Claus Scheingraber and Roby Thill
EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses

The quote I read to you, you will find on Page 3:

The ICNIRP recommendations were adopted by the EU in its Council Recommendation of 1999, without considering long-term non-thermal effects. However, it should be stressed that at an international EMF confer ence in London (2008), Professor Paolo Vecchia, ICNIRP Chairman from 2004 to 2012, said about the exposure guidelines:
“What they are not”: “They are not mandatory prescriptions for safety”, “They are not the’ ‘last word’ on the issue”, and “They are not defensive walls for industry or others”

Please also read about the authors of this medical paper, listed on the bottom of page 1.

Around the publication time of the EMF GUIDE, the late, biophysicist, Prof. Dr. Martin Blank, revealed to the stunned HESA Committee, in a hearing in Ottawa, that the radiation department of Health Canada, was top loaded with engineers, but had not a single employee, with a medical nor biology degree, but yet, they feel qualified to make decisions which will impact peoples health.
In light of this, please consider that the authors of the EMF Medical Guide, are indeed medical professionals.

I also mentioned to you, that the WHO EMF Project, headed by electrical engineer, Emily VanDeventer, with close ties to the telecom industry, which the telecom industry like to refer to, is a different entity than the WHO International Agency for the Research on Cancer (IARC).

https://ehtrust.org/will-the-world-health-organization-dr-van-deventer-answer-questions-on-transparency/
Will the World Health Organization Dr. Van Deventer Answer Questions on Transparency? – Environmental Health Trust (ehtrust.org)

The IARC vets experts for conflicts of interest and industry ties and has classified RF radiation as a Class 2 B possible carcinogen, whereas the EMF Project (also under the WHO umbrella) is criticized for a lack of transparency and industry loyalty. See (Hardell 2017) published in the International Journal for Oncology with details on the industry ties of the WHO EMF Project.

I trust, once Council realizes, that you were not provided with these important medical facts, a cease and desist order should be considered against TELUS, until everyone is given the opportunity to learn about the grim downside of chronic cell tower radiation exposure. Like smoking, the health effects of microwave radiation is cumulative.

You would not be the first Council to order a stop, and even the removal of a cell tower, as town after town has done, after credible medical evidence surfaced. You are within your legal right to do so, as Mr. Gregg, withheld this important information from you, and the residents of Qualicum Beach.

You can count on my full support, in this matter.

Kind regards,

Marcus Schluschen
EMF Consultant

“As a functional medicine physician, I am often asked what are the most important and powerful treatments to healing patients with complex chronic disease. Hands down-the answer is eliminating harmful EMF exposure.
What I have experienced is my patients will recover more completely and MUCH faster when we address the EMF exposures. Medical science has recently discovered the amazing process of the lymphatic drainage and detoxification of the brain that only occurs during sleep. This is a critical function to maintain health brain and nervous system function.”Dr. Nocole Shorrock, MD, IFMCP

 

Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“I am not a politician. I am just a simple person who has come to break down this system.”      Volodymyr Zelensky

http://stopsmartmetersbc.com/

Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation