1) Dr. Lennart Hardell summarizes and critiques a report by the Health Council of the Netherlands regarding wireless radiation and, specifically, 5G. Very significant information and a very interesting read. Includes a lot of information about conflicts of interest in many of the most influential groups, such as WHO, ICNIRP and IEEE. One very telling statement is:
“As a general rule, scientists who are of the opposing opinion, i.e., that there are health risks associated with exposure to RF radiation, have never been invited to take part of these expert groups. Thus, the opinions expressed in these reports are not representative of the opinions in the scientific community on effects from EMFs.”
And these are the committees/groups upon which Health Canada relies to justify Safety Code 6.
Health Council of the Netherlands and evaluation of the fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication and cancer risks
“The current evaluation by the Health Council of the Netherlands is based on a WHO draft and SSM report. It also recommends using ICNIRP guidelines, considered to be insufficient to protect against health hazards, such as cancer, by the majority of the scientists in this field (https://www.emfscientist.org). The report does not represent a thorough, balanced, objective, and up-to-date evaluation of cancer risks and other hazardous effects from RF radiation. It is also strikingly contradictory as it concludes that serious health effects such as cancer and birth defects are “possible.” Yet it has no objection to the roll-out of 5G and recommends that later studies are performed to study health outcomes such as cancer and birth defects. Thus, no lessons are learned from existing observations on increased cancer risks.
The conclusion by the Commission that there is no reason to stop the use of lower frequencies for 5G up to 3.5 GHz because of no “proven adverse health effects,” merely reflects the biased conclusions by ICNIRP dominated groups. Thus that conclusion must be dismissed, and new guidelines for previous and new frequencies must be established considering the new technology, the different propagation pattern for 5G, and increased RF radiation.
A moratorium is urgently required on the implementation of 5G for wireless communication. Ultimately, wired solutions are preferred.”
Hardell L. Health Council of the Netherlands and evaluation of the fifth generation, 5G, for wireless communication and cancer risks. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(6): 393-403 [PMID: 34189065 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i6.393]
2) In last night’s update [1) – https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/2021-11-29-evidence-for-connection-between-emf-and-covid/], I shared a paper by Drs. Brown and Rubik suggesting a possible relationship between RFR exposure and Covid. Dr. Rubik, in her separate letter, noted that many comments were made by the various reviewers. The reviews are now shared, but note that few have names attached, so it’s hard to know the independence or bias of reviewers.
Evidence for a Connection between COVID-19 and Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation from Wireless Telecommunications Including Microwaves and Millimeter Waves Original Research Paper Journal of Clinical and Translational Research
3) An update from Arthur Firstenberg about the lawsuit re. the US Telecommunications Act. He asks for a help circulating this info widely, including to media. FYI, the Coalition is one of the organizations joining as a “friend of the court”.
ORGANIZATIONS FROM 34 STATES AND 29 COUNTRIES JOIN AMICUS BRIEF TO U.S. SUPREME COURT
“On November 23, 2021, 289 organizations and 34 individuals filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in support of our petition to the United States Supreme Court. Our petition asks the Court to strike down, as unconstitutional, a clause in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that prohibits local governments from regulating cell towers on the basis of health and the environment….
We have about one and a half months to circulate these three documents far and wide, in order to get publicity and widespread support from around the world, before our petition goes before the Supreme Court for consideration. We want the general public to start talking about our petition, so that the Supreme Court hears about it from many sources, and knows that it is important.”
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant.” Mitch Kapor