1) Unfortunately, this very interesting online meeting hosted by The Future of Science and Technology, European Parliament, will take place overnight for us in North America. If I am able to find out if it will be recorded, I will let you know. Hopefully, we can at least find info about the 2 new studies. Take a look at the website — some very interesting topics are discussed.
(click on photos to enlarge)
31-05-2021 10:00 am (Brussels time)
Presentation of the studies: ‘Health impact of 5G’ and ‘Environmental impacts of 5G’ (online event)
“Over the last decades, novel wireless communication technologies, such as mobile telephones, cellular networks and Wi-Fi, have been developed at unparalleled speed. The forthcoming rollout of 5G technology across the EU is expected to bring new opportunities for citizens and businesses by enabling faster internet browsing, streaming and downloading, as well as by ensuring better connectivity. However, 5G, along with 3G and 4G, with which it will operate in parallel for several years, may also pose threats to human health. This event will present the results of two STOA studies, which take stock of our present understanding of the impacts of 5G on health and the environment.”
or https://tinyurl.com/sxk3tx2z
2) Free Light Therapy training for EHS with Sheena Symington (from the electrosensitive society) Friday, May 21 at 11:30 AM (ET)
We are going to be holding a zoom light therapy training for EHS with Sheena Symington (from the Electrosensitive Society) this Friday May 21st at 11:30 (ET.)
For those of you who do not know Sheena, in addition to founding the Electrosensitive Society, she also works as a research assistant to Dr. Magda Havas and is a leading EHS educator and advocate.
You are very welcome to join us and some info is below & attached. The intervention can be life changing for people with EHS. The therapy is not something you can do on yourself but a practitioner or trusted friend can do it for you easily.
Please contact me via this email if you are interested in attending and I will send you the Zoom link for the meeting:
Many thanks,
Pam
A recent research paper on the intervention (it has other applications as well):
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011373/
3) Initially, it was reported that just a few people at embassies in Cuba and China had suffered from suspected microwave radiation attacks. Now, more than 130 people in various countries are among the victims. Why is this happening now?
Mysterious Ailments are Said to be More Widespread Among U.S. Personnel
“Mysterious episodes that caused brain injuries in spies, diplomats, soldiers and other U.S. personnel overseas starting five years ago now number more than 130 people, far more than previously known, according to current and former officials….
The new total adds cases from Europe and elsewhere in Asia and reflects efforts by the administration to more thoroughly review other incidents amid concern over a spate of them in recent months.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/12/us/politics/biden-cia-brain-injury.html
Report Points to Microwave ‘Attack’ as Likely Source of Mystery Illnesses that Hit Diplomats and Spies
“The most probable cause of a series of mysterious afflictions that sickened American spies and diplomats abroad in the past several years was radiofrequency energy, a type of radiation that includes microwaves, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine has concluded in a report.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/business/economy/havana-syndrome-microwave-attack.html
Letters:
From: Marcus Schluschen (name given with permission)
To: “Ries, Bernie (IC)” <bernie.ries@canada.ca>, “brian masse” <brian.masse@parl.gc.ca>, “martin proulx” <martin.proulx@canada.ca>
Cc: “rachel blaney” <rachel.blaney@parl.gc.ca>,
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 6:44:58 PM
Subject: Re: Who is in charge? ISED or telecoms?
Dear. Mr. Masse and Proulx, I am including you in this fruitless ongoing conversation with ISED’s managers.
Re: refusal to answer
Dear Mr. Ries,
Unfortunately, there appears to be an ongoing communication problem, since my previous questions to you and Mr. Krenz remain unanswered.
My questions to ISED had nothing to do with industry friendly, Health Canada [HC], as I am fully aware that they cannot admit fault of any kind, as it would open the flood gates to lawsuits if HC would publicly concede that their science does not meet today’s science, rendering Code 6 non-protective.
Since, as a public servant, you are unwilling to provide any answers to my previous questions, I can deduct from your avoidance that ISED is in bed with the wireless industry, even more so than previously expected.
I will not bother you anymore with these questions, as ISED’s deliberate stonewalling wastes not only my time, but yours as well.
However, since I, as well as many others, are deeply troubled by the grossly inappropriate behavior of industry lobbyist, Brian Gregg, when dealing with the public, who are made to believe that he acts as an independent consultant, with their interest in mind, I would like to reiterate my question, why he is allowed to deliberately mislead the public.
– Why does ISED allow, that industry lobbyist, Brian Gregg, and other lobbyists, are allowed to hand out decades old information, such as the 1997 Canadian Exposure Assessments? Why does ISED not demand of him to only hand out information which is scientifically current?
– Why is the public not entitled to learn that the infamous NGO, ICNIRP, is a private club, whose guidelines, which were devised back in 1998, only consider tissue heating, and does not provide protection from non-ionizing radiation which occurs at levels several hundred thousand times below ICNIRP’s and Health Canada’s guidelines?
– Why is industries salesman, Brian Gregg, allowed to grossly mislead the public, as he has done in Gold River in 2019? I was there!
– Why does ISED allow Brian Gregg to submit way off the mark, “artist’s renderings”, as he did in Gold River, which I witnessed, instead of true to life photographic images, which would depict a photo shopped, but correct, representation of the cell tower, the firm he is representing, is poised to impose on the community? Any 10 year old child is capable of producing such a true to life looking image, using Photoshop!
If such underhandedness by industry lobbyists is tolerated by ISED, what does this say about the integrity of ISED, who is supposed to be in charge? Any lobbyists, who engages in deceitful methods towards the public, as Mr. Gregg, should be reported by ISED, and have his license revoked.
Your non scripted response will be appreciated.
Kind regards,
Marcus Schluschen
EMF Consultant
*****
From: Ries, Bernie (IC)
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 8:31 AM
To: Marcus Schluschen
Cc: rachel.blaney@parl.gc.ca ;
Subject: RE: Who is in charge? ISED or telecoms?
Good morning Mr. Schluschen.
As stated previously, the department does meet regularly with various groups such as land use authorities, concerned citizens, consultants and proponents to answer questions and provide guidance related to our policy document on tower siting, CPC 2-0-03.
As the responsibility for developing Safety Code 6 lies with Health Canada, concerns or questions regarding its development should be directed to that Department. Any research concerning the effects of RF energy on humans that you would like to share with the Government of Canada should be directed to Health Canada.
Regards,
Bernie Ries
Operations Manager, STS-Western Region
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada / Government of Canada
bernie.ries@canada.ca / Tel: 250-216-0728
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“Get action. Seize the moment. Man was never intended to become an oyster.” Theodore Roosevelt