2021-05-14 700+ scientists plea to boycott 5G devices

1) In Canada and the USA, emphasis is being placed on improved internet access. The American Jobs Plan includes billions for providing enhanced broadband to many areas where performance is slow or non-existent. The telecoms are pushing for this “broadband” to be equated with wireless, notably 5G. Dr. Davis and members of EHT board have written to President Biden re. broadband using fiber optic cable to and through homes and businesses. During his campaign, Pres. Biden said, when confronted by a woman suffering health effects from 5G, that the possibility of 5G being responsible should be thoroughly studied. Hopefully, he will follow through.

EHT Asks President Biden to Halt 5G and to Invest in Wired Broadband

“The American Jobs Plan, as it is known, is an ambitious program designed to update everything from the nation’s interstate highways and ports to public housing and utilities. It calls for $45 billion to ensure no family is forced to drink water from a lead pipe, which according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), can slow development and cause learning, behavior, and hearing problems in children as well as kidney and brain damage.

Environmental Health Trust Founder and President Devra Davis and EHT Advisory Board Scientific Members Paul Ben Ishai, Anthony B. Miller, Alvaro Augusto de Salles, and Claudio Fernández Rodríguez, and EHT Executive Director Theodora Scarato have written President Biden and members of his administration to urge them to develop a sustainable wired, not wireless, broadband infrastructure.”

https://myemail.constantcontact.com/Letter-to-Biden—2-Trillion-Infrastructure-Plan-Must-Include-Safe–Wired-Broadband.html?soid=1116515520935&aid=P3Ah8ody_bA

The letter is here:

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Letter-to-Biden-on-Infrastructure_-FCC-Environmental-Health-Trust-.pdf

2) Many of us have been facing the denial of science by the bureaucrats and the proliferation of dangerous wireless devices for many years. Patricia Burke, in her 3rd article, speaks to the evolution of our battle from fighting cell towers, to cell phones, to Wi-Fi in schools, to smeters, and now to 5G. The denials continue but over the years more and more people have become educated and joined us. One day, those people like McNamee in Health Canada, our Public Health Officers, ICNIRP members, the bent scientists who work for the telecoms will be remembered for their corruption and the untold harm they have allowed to happen.

(click on photos to enlarge)

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2021/05/5g-emf-rf-mothers-day-2021-part-3.html

5G/EMF/RF Mother’s Day 2021 Part 3

This betrayal trauma continues a decade later. Had the emerging issues been heeded back in 2010, or 1998, we would not be where we are now. The posture of not believing and/or not caring has grown worse over time, with unsubstantiated claims that increased wireless telecommunication (including broadband and 5G) is safe, sustainable, and necessary. History will review these circumstances with horror and astonishment. In hearings, citizens are often rushed to speak in 3 minutes or less, if they are allowed to speak at all, while corporations and the tobacco scientists they employ drone on for hours to legislators that they finance. Rather than heeding practicing physicians accurately diagnosing microwave sickness, immune dysfunction, and other effects of wireless exposures, policy is proceeding on the basis of a house of cards, built on mercenary science.”

5G/EMF/RF Mother’s Day 2021 Part 3

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2021/05/5g-emf-rf-mothers-day-2021-part-3.html

3) A plea by more than 700 European scientists, who are concerned about the health of our planet and future generations, to refuse to buy or use 5G products and services. Better yet, stop buying and using wireless devices. The only way to make industry hear our concerns is by hitting them in their bank accounts.

Call for collective boycott of 5G launched by 600 scientists

“We therefore solemnly call on all citizens concerned about the future of present and future generations to boycott all products directly or indirectly linked to 5G and its world. If you’re being encouraged to switch to the phone or 5G plan, even for a low price, say no. If a colleague is retiring, find something other than a 5G headset to give them. If you are asked to promote 5G products as part of your job, disobey quietly. Choose non-connected appliances. Don’t buy a kid a 5G drone (and no drone at all, for that matter). In short, continue to live without 5G, as now. And revolve this recommendation around you, so that a collective movement emerges to resist conditioning as well as followingism.business-as-usual which persists in crushing the earth and its inhabitants: drying up the business and becoming (finally) responsible for our common future.”

https://www.liberation.fr/idees-et-debats/tribunes/boycottons-la-5g-20210501_FH4YLLHMUVCTLBT5ZY7QEW5WDU/

Letters:

http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/

From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>
Date: May 14, 2021
Subject: Letter #10 Dear BC Minister of Education Health Canada is presenting inaccurate and false information
To: <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>

Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside,

– Did you know school officials refer to Health Canada and Safety Code 6 for their information on the safety of wireless technology in our schools?

– Did you know that the Health Canada’s website in many respects is an opinion piece written by an unknown author, supporting the wireless industry by presenting inaccurate and false information about the safety of wireless technology?

– Did you know Health Canada was unable to present parents, teachers and student with any peer-reviewed studies by medical experts or scientists to support their claims of “no health risks” from the biological effects of prolonged exposure to microwave radiation?

– Did you know that on February 20, 2013, James McNamee, scientist for Health Canada, admitted in the Superior Court of Quebec, that the Safety Code 6 guideline for microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology is based ONLY on thermal effects, whether it heats the skin in 6 minutes?

– Did you know this means Health Canada does not have any regulations in place to protect the public from long-term exposure to the proven biological effects of the “non-thermal” levels of microwave radiation?

– Did you know that scientists, medical experts and safety advocates spoke before Parliament’s Standing Committee on the outdated, incomplete and invalid guidelines of Safety Code 6 and asked Health Canada to approve the 12 recommendations presented by the HESA Committee?

– Did you know Health Canada states that they “continuously monitor the research and scientific literature on the health effects of RF exposure” yet Health Canada fails to meet the test of international standards that requires rigorous scientific methods, transparency, full public consultation from initial scoping throughout the process and health-protective precautionary interpretation of findings?

– Did you know Health Canada has never completed a proper review of the scientific evidence that meets international standards, nor has it published any of its investigations?

– Did you know Health Canada shows complete disregard for the $30 million US National Toxicology Program study with more than 2,000 rodents that showed clear evidence of cancer and DNA damage—despite the fact that this study passed through peer-review three times before publication?

– Did you know Dr. Anthony Miller, a Canadian MD epidemiologist who has been awarded the Medal of Honour by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and in 2019 was named a Member of the Order of Canada, stated, “When considered with recent animal experimental evidence, the recent epidemiological studies strengthen and support the conclusion that RFR [RF Radiation] should be categorized as carcinogenic to humans (IARC Group 1).”

– Did you know the guidelines in Health Canada’s Safety Code 6, which ISED relies on to regulate the microwave radiation emitting from all wireless devices, were first established in 1979?

– Did you know the regulation of cell phones and other wireless communication devices is the responsibility of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED), yet the ISED has ignored the fact that some popular cells phones are emitting RF radiation 4 – 11 times over the current Safety Code 6 guidelines?

Our question is: Why would school officials rely on Health Canada for safety advice on Microwave Radiation Exposure when Health Canada is presenting inaccurate and false information?

Respectfully,

Janis Hoffmann (name given with permission)

Parents for Safe Schools

[corrected link] – https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HvPyw-az7eIIKtDaPi-ayb1yioB0CwC9/view

HESA 2015 Recommendations

https://c4st.org/hesa-2015-recommendations/

https://www.c4st.org/images/hesa-2015/submissions/C4ST-Submission-to-MOH-re-140-Missing-Studies-E.pdf

Click to access C4ST-Submission-to-MOH-re-140-Missing-Studies-E.pdf

Health Canada admits Safety Code 6 guideline for microwave radiation is based ONLY on thermal effects!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5jmD9YgdXp8

https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/health-minister-caught-misleading-canadians-about-safety-of-their-wireless-devices-596620961.html

http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2020/11/why-is-ised-not-doing-anything-about.html

Letters #1- 9http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/

 

Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“The Internet is so big, so powerful and pointless that for some people it is a complete substitute for life.”     Andrew Brown

www.stopsmartmetersbc.com

 

Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation