2021-04-10 Another lawsuit: cellphone–>brain cancer

1) The lawsuits are coming, just as they did for tobacco. The telecoms have known that RF is dangerous. They have seen the studies, even paid for many of them, but hid them from their customers. They have demeaned and gas-lighted independent scientists, just as the tobacco industry did. People could choose to smoke or not, but we are exposed to RF without choice from the many cell towers, smeters, etc — so there will be more harmed by this toxin. It’s horrible that people are becoming ill and dying — but we need these lawsuits.

Lundy, Lundy, Soileau & South, LLP: In New Attack on Telecom Secrecy, Family of Pastor Alleges Cell Phone Radiation Link to His Deadly Brain Cancer

“The family of a Sulphur, La. pastor who died last year from aggressive brain cancer alleges in a new federal-court lawsuit that the telecom industry has hidden the known health risks of cell phone radiation for decades, the Lundy, Lundy, Soileau & South, LLP law firm said today.

According to the lawsuit, the telecom industry suppressed credible cell phone safety concerns and has conspired to conceal or alter results of safety studies to make them more “market friendly.” The lawsuit cites a long history of relevant scientific studies and industry actions taken since the 1980s, including the firing, defunding or denigration of researchers who discovered adverse effects associated with cell phone use.”


or   https://tinyurl.com/446by789

2) Libby Kelley sent this information about what is happening in Tucson, Arizona now that OTARD is allowing transmitters to be put on homes. Industry is knocking on doors in her neighbourhood. We must expect that it is likely industry will try to do this here.

Write to your municipal government, MLAs, MPs, family members, etc. to let them know this must not happen here.


See Ms. Kelley’s letter to her neighborhood via Patch:

Community-wide alert! New 5G antennas to be installed on the roofs of private homes.


3) Marg Friesen will be hosting the next “community action” meeting this coming Wednesday. It will be interesting for all to be able to discuss Safety Code 6, which says it pertains to those working at or visiting federally regulated sites. And, as we all know all too well, does not relate to non-thermal radiation, the type emitted by every wireless device, including cell towers.

Gather your questions because this is an opportunity for a good discussion about the problems faced when presenting to local Councils, politicians, school boards, etc. — their hands are tied because of SC 6. You must pre-register.

(click on photo to enlarge)


Canadians for Safe Technology (C4ST)
Community Actions Zoom Meeting this Wednesday, April 14 at 7:30 ET.

TOPIC: “Demystifying Safety Code 6”.

“Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 guidelines have been adopted by the federal department that regulates cell tower and small network antenna, cell phones and other radiofrequency emitting devices commercially available in Canada. In addition other jurisdictions e.g. school boards and provinces have adopted these guidelines as their “standards” even though they can set their own safer limits.

C4ST’s Marg Friesen and Frank Clegg will go over the main points of Safety Code 6 in terms a layperson can understand and they will lead a discussion on why it is outdated and not protective of Canadian’s health. Meeting is open to all.

“The purpose of this code is to establish safety limits for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic energy in the frequency range from 3 kHz to 300 GHz.”


Please register in advance for this meeting:

C4ST is a national, not-for-profit, volunteer-based coalition of parents, citizens and experts.



Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“Far and away the best prize that life has to offer is the chance to work hard at work worth doing.”     Theodore Roosevelt




Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation