1) The problems with 5G are many and varied, with increased health effects being just one. Hopefully, the performance issues will be enough to “sink” it.
5G IS A SINKING SHIP: SLOW, POOR PERFORMANCE AND A POWER HOG
“As it turns out 5G is not all it is cracked up to be. 5G is a “power hog”. Terrible reception and poor performance plague the network. Here are some resources and recent news reports on the way 5G is failing to live up to the hype.
“We speed tested 5G phones against 4G ones. America’s new nationwide 5G networks weren’t much faster — and in some places they were slower.” –Washington Post The 5G lie” September 2020
(click on photos to enlarge)
“More than half a million Korean subscribers have cancelled 5G contracts because of poor connectivity and smartphone power drain issues.” –South Koreans turn against 5G over poor performance”
2) Amazon is introducing a personal terminal that will receive phased array signals from low level [LEO] satellites circling the earth to provide internet everywhere, to each home individually.
Custom-built antenna architecture will allow Amazon to deliver a small, affordable customer terminal to connect unserved and underserved communities around the world.
“Months after receiving approval from the Federal Communications Commission, Project Kuiper has hit another key milestone on its path to delivering fast, affordable broadband through a constellation of 3,236 low Earth orbit satellites.
We recently completed initial development on the antenna for our low-cost customer terminal, a critical part of the Kuiper System that allows customers to connect to satellites passing overhead. The Ka-band phased array antenna is based on a new architecture capable of delivering high-speed, low-latency broadband in a form factor that is smaller and lighter than legacy antenna designs. Our prototype is already delivering speeds up to 400 Mbps (Megabits per second), and performance will continue to improve in future iterations.”
The advertisement being sent around to entice investors.
JEFF BEZO’S BIG BET
3) Few and far between “quiet zones”, areas with low EMF environments where those who are sensitive can go to heal. Unfortunately this large, pristine area is in the mountains of Arizona. After COVID-19, a place for sensitive Canadians to consider. But how quiet will these zones be once the many 1,000s of satellites are irradiating every inch on earth?
Announcing Rancho Quieto a EMF-Quiet Reprieve in Unspoiled Nature
From: “citizensforsafertech” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 4:02:10 PM
Subject: Brain cancers – incorrect information
Dear. Dr. Roach,
I am a regular reader of your column and often learn something interesting. Thank you. But today I read something that is incorrect. Knowing that you make every effort to educate your readers, I am offering evidence that I hope you will consider including in one of your columns.
You said: ” The biggest risk for brain cancer is ionizing radiation, such as a person would get from radiation treatment of a childhood cancer. However, back in the 1950s, radiation was used to treat skin infections on the head, which has led to an increased risk of brain cancer in those so treated. Your cousins are not old enough for this kind of exposure, however.”
Granted that exposure to ionizing radiation can cause cancer, but such incidents are rare. Instead, a more common exposure that can lead to brain cancer is non-ionizing radiation emitted by wireless devices such as cell phones. This manmade radiation has proliferated exponentially in the last 20 years to the point that it now is virtually inescapable.
There are 1000s of studies going back more than 50 years, many of the early ones done by the US military ( See studies provided by Dr. Zory Glaser https://zoryglaser.com/the-history-of-microwave-radiation/ ), warning that exposure to even low levels of non-ionizing radiation can cause serious biological effects ranging from but not limited to neurological and cardiac problems, DNA damage, various cancers, and infertility. Back in the 1950s, long before wireless devices were used by the general public, “microwave sickness” was a common term used to describe symptoms resulting from exposure.
In 2011, IARC, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified non-ionizing radiation emitted from all wireless devices (for example cell and cordless phones, wi-fi, smart meters, cell towers) as a 2B (possible) human carcinogen, the same as DDT and lead. Panel members said that the classification would have been higher but mechanisms were not clear. Since 2011 several important studies have identified mechanisms, such as oxidative stress, causing many experts to demand that non-ionizing radiation be classified as a Class 1 (true) carcinogen.
Specific to the article referenced above, even though the incidence of malignant brain tumors is fairly low, it is increasing rapidly, especially for glioblastomas, on a curve that is consistent with the increasing use of cell phones. https://ehtrust.org/scientific-documentation-cell-phone-radiation-associated-brain-tumor-rates-rising/ Experts have warned that children are especially vulnerable to non-ionizing radiation and should not be allowed to use cell phones at all. https://ehtrust.org/research-on-childrens-vulnerability-to-cell-phone-radio-frequency-radiation/
One last reference from Physicians for Safe Technology:
“The development of brain tumors from radio frequency radiation emitted from cell phones is a critical public health issue. Brain tumors cause significant neurologic morbidity and mortality. ABTA Statistics. Cell phone and cordless phone use is increasing dramatically, especially in youth. The brain is the main target of these hand held devices which are placed close to the head. Wireless virtual reality eyewear is now commercialized and even used in schools. Fernandez et al has shown significantly increased radiofrequency radiation emissions from these devices, especially virtual reality. Wireless Bluetooth airbus are now placed in the ear canal in greater proximity to the brain and other vulnerable head and neck structures. Because exposure to wireless radio frequency exposure is invisible and there is a long term latency period for development, the connection to brain tumors is easily dismissed. Basic science is showing non-ionizing radiofrequency EMR at low power can damage neural cells and cause DNA damage through reactive oxygen species and possibly other mechanisms. Many comprehensive epidemiology studies and long term meta-analysis now link cell phone use to both benign and malignant brain tumors.”
As you know, this topic has not been taught in most medical schools but it is vital that doctors learn about this growing health concern. Last month there was an accredited EMF Medical Conference with 3 days of sessions by experts. Videos are available at https://emfconference2021.com/.
Dr. Roach, I so hope you will consider a column on this vital topic. Most people are unaware of the potential risks associated with their convenient gadgets. Warnings are either non-existent or, as with cell phones, are hidden in small print in manuals that are seldom read. Your vast audience deserves to have this information.
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“Optimism is the faith that leads to achievement. Nothing can be done without hope and confidence.” Helen Keller