2020-09-03 Family claims harm by RF exposures

1) CHILDREN INJURED BY WIRELESS RADIATION- KLEIBER FAMILY AMICUS BRIEF

“Dan and Catherine Kleiber submitted an Amicus Curiae Brief in support of Environmental Health Trust et al., v. FCC

“Dan and Catherine Kleiber and their children have been injured by the outdated thermally-based radiofrequency/microwave (RF/MW) exposure guidelines adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) despite the fact that they have consistently avoided use of wireless technology. The Kleibers have been harmed by involuntary ambient RF/MW exposures resulting from the FCC’s refusal to enact biologically-based population protective RF/MW radiation exposure safety standards for all RF/MW exposures.

The Kleibers highlight comments made by injured individuals in Docket 13-84, showing that the FCC is violating human rights, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act by not enacting biologically-based population- and environmentally-protective safety standards for the radiation emitted by wireless technology.”

Children Injured by Wireless Radiation- Kleiber Family Amicus Brief

https://ehtrust.org/children-injured-by-wireless-radiation-kleiber-family-amicus-brief/

The 47 page court filing document, which I haven’t read: https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/20-1025-Kleiber-Amicus-Brief.pdf

2) Rogers’ hype presented as an article in a local newspaper

Rogers bringing 5G to South Okanagan

http://www.pentictonherald.ca/news/article_9e7362c2-ec81-11ea-b58c-9f31acfb6d11.html

3) One of our members, who lives in Ontario, sent me the following info along with several articles re. wind turbines. These and others have been put on our website.

(click on photos to enlarge)

http://www.windontario.ca/pictures/

https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/wind-turbines/ (under “Misc”)

“With a diagnosis of EHS, MCS, MCAS, & Infrasound sensitivity by Ontario’s top Environmental Clinician, Dr. Riina Bray, my living conditions are nothing short of torture. Despite the governments position that IWT’s are safe and there is nothing to see here, I can personally confirm that it is a miserable unhealthy torturous existence.

Somehow Industrial Wind Turbines and Transformer Stations have been able to escape regulations by REDA.” (health canada’s Radiation Emitting Devices Act) “I’m comfortable saying it is purposeful to not include IWT’s and Transformer stations, or else they wouldn’t be regulations of 550m to the centre of a family home.”

Preliminary Results: Exploring Why Some Families Living in Proximity to Wind Turbine Facilities Contemplate Vacating Their Homes—A Community-Based Study

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339379748_Preliminary_Results_Exploring_Why_Some_Families_Living_in_Proximity_to_Wind_Turbine_Facilities_Contemplate_Vacating_Their_Homes-A_Community-Based_Study

https://stopsmartmetersbc.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Wind-Turbine-RF-Electromagnetic-Energy-Exploring-the-Risk-of-Harm-to-Human-Health-by-Carmen-Krogh-December-03-2018.pdf

Letters:

http://www.pentictonherald.ca/news/article_9e7362c2-ec81-11ea-b58c-9f31acfb6d11.html

From: X
To: “Mayor Mike Morden” <mmorden@mapleridge.ca>, “Councillor Chelsea Meadus” <cmeadus@mapleridge.ca>, “Gordy Robson” <grobson@mapleridge.ca>, “Councillor Judy Dueck” <jdueck@mapleridge.ca>, “Councillor Kiersten Duncan” <kduncan@mapleridge.ca>, “Councillor Ryan Svendsen” <rsvendsen@mapleridge.ca>, “Councillor Ahmed Yousef” <ayousef@mapleridge.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 12:47:45 PM
Subject: 5G

Dear Mayor and Councillors,

I understand that Rogers is very anxious to expand its 5G network into many communities across Canada, and I think Maple Ridge is on their list.

I urge you to explore very carefully and thoroughly the implications of approving Maple Ridge’s inclusion in this expansion. I’m sure you’ll be told that their technology meets all Safety Code 6 requirements. Rogers won’t tell you when Safety Code 6 requirements were established; the technology has changed drastically since then.

Will Rogers tell you the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation? (Do you know the difference?) If the electromagnetic radiation heats (as in microwave ovens), does that mean when it doesn’t heat, it’s safe? (be careful – that’s a bit of a trick question!)

Will Rogers tell you that Lloyds of London and other insurers won’t insure for damage caused by EMR (whether it heats or not)?

Will Rogers tell you that 5G will enable the full force of the Internet of Things to be established? Do you know about ZigBee chips in your appliances and how the collection of your data will be facilitated by 5G? How secure and unhackable will the Internet of Things be?

I could go on, but I will just urge you, once again, to go beyond the word of industry (after all, they will be telling you whatever will make their product most attractive) and beyond Safety Code 6 to Physicians for Safe Technology (https://mdsafetech.org/) and Citizens for Safe Technology (https://maisonsaine.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Introducing-C4ST.pdf). If you have any knowledge of science, you might want to look at (https://mdsafetech.org/science/).

If you’ve read this far, please consider that we CAN experience almost all the convenience of our wireless world without 5G. A fully wired world using only fiber optics is possible – and far far more secure and less hackable. Please educate yourselves fully before accepting Maple Ridge’s inclusion in any 5G rollout.

Sincerely,
A Maple Ridge resident

 

Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“Laws control the lesser man… Right conduct controls the greater one.”     Mark Twain

www.stopsmartmetersbc.com

Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation