1) The voices of the millions of people demanding a moratorium of the 5G grid are being heard. Industry is hitting back with a new effort to mislead about its safety and security with a counter to Stop5Ginternational. In 2003 Swiss Com, in a patent application for a new Wi-Ffi device, acknowledged the science that shows exposure to EMR increases risk of biological harm.
Now it’s joining with other telecoms and industry to say concerns about 5G are baseless.
Initiative aims to overcome Swiss public’s 5G technology misconceptions
“Supporters of 5G mobile technology in Switzerland have launched a new website to engage in discussions with the general public about any technical, scientific and health concerns.
Around 45 figures from Swiss society, science, business and politics, as well as 19 associations, have joined forces to launch the “CHANCE5G” online platform on Friday. The initiative is financed by the Swiss Telecommunications Association (asut) and its members, which include telecom firms Sunrise, Swisscom, Cellnex, as well as Ericsson and Huawei
The organisers of the “CHANCE5G” platform claim that the development of 5G is being held back, both politically and within society, due to false conclusions and a lack of knowledge about the technology. It wants to improve dialogue around 5G and demonstrate the advantages of the technology via specific applications.”
2) The planning department of a county in Hawaii has passed a moratorium to ban 5G until it’s proven to be safe. Now it will go to Council for approval. Testimony by experts are included as is the Resolution which could be modified quite easily for use in BC.
(click on photos to enlarge)
COUNCIL TO VOTE ON RESOLUTION TO HALT 5G BUILDOUT IN HAWAII COUNTY
“A Resolution to halt 5G has passed the planning board and is set to be voted on by the Hawaii county council.
Resolution 678-20 “CALLING UPON ALL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES OPERATING IN HAWAII COUNTY TO CEASE THE BUILDOUT OF 5G WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE UNTIL SUCH TECHNOLOGIES HAVE BEEN PROVEN THROUGH INDEPENDENT RESEARCH AND TESTING TO BE SAFE TO HUMAN HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT” had the votes in the planning committee to move on to the Council after significant testimony in favor.”
Hawaii County Council Passes Resolution to Halt 5G Until Proven Safe
https://ehtrust.org/hawaii-county-council-to-consider-resolution-banning-5g-until-proven-safe/
3) A very interesting concept, a dome to provide protection from EMR. Aluminum has been shown to be a good insulator for radiation. Some people line their bedrooms with aluminum sheeting and this reduces the level in the room significantly. Care has to be done, though, to ensure that there is no wireless within the dome/shielded room because it could reflect and actually increase the level. I have no specs on this dome, but it could help people to sleep better and, perhaps, help people who are sensitive.
Our EMF Protection Dome
“According to the EMF Academy, aluminum reduces EMF radiation by absorbing or scattering the photons as they pass through. Reflectix is made of two outer layers of aluminum foil, bonded to a tough layer of polyethylene, two inner layers of insulating bubbles which resist conductive heat flow and EMF. The Reflctix is then sewn between two layers of elegant white fabric and attached to the inside of the dome frame. A Reflectix curtain is offered with each dome liner.”
https://pacificdomes.com/dwell-domes/emf-protection-dome/
Letters:
From: Finlay MacPherson (name given with permission)
To: “Karina Gould” <Karina.Gould@parl.gc.ca>
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 10:56:42 AM
Subject: Health Canada’s Safety Code 6
Dear Ms. Gould,
I recently came across and read with some dismay your email of June 22, 2020 5:27 p.m. to Mr. Peter Dudink, and am shocked at the misinformation in your response to his concerns. Your claim that Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 is protective “for all known established adverse health effects” is factually false, as is most of the rest of your response.
Just like ICNIRP, IEEE and FCC limits, those of Safety Code 6 completely ignore the well proven adverse non-thermal biological effects. Many of these effects have been known for the past 8 decades, and occur at levels far below existing Canadian government limits. Wireless industry promoters have long managed to influence the setting of standards and create doubt in the minds of many, much like the promoters of the tobacco and asbestos industries once did until their views were considered biased and harmful to health. I have personal knowledge of this being true and how this worked from the 10 years in the 1970’s I was employed in management with a major Canadian asbestos company.
Many eminent scientists and epidemiologists are of the opinion there is no “safe” level for wireless radiation, as the adverse biological effects are cumulative the longer one is exposed. Any information you might wish to learn on these effects is easily available online. I have attached an article entitled “Health Canada – The Peoples No. 1 Enemy” which pretty well summarizes the present situation. As a Member of Parliament, you should be ashamed that the health of Canadians is so threatened by the continued ignorance of those tasked with ensuring health safety.
Had you taken the time, you would learn that many of the cell phones currently sold to the public actually exceed the specified S.A.R., yet what has the government done to stop this? Apparently, not much, other than rely on the manufacturers of such devices to do the testing for them.
Do you really believe existing exposure limits provide “protection for all age groups, including children, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week”? If so, in my opinion and that of many others, I can only conclude you are seriously misinformed and nothing more than another trained parrot for Health Canada providing false assurance of safety to a concerned citizen.
Sincerely,
Finlay MacPherson
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“Our population and our use of the finite resources of planet Earth are growing exponentially, along with our technical ability to change the environment for good or ill.” Stephen Hawking