1) Dr. Kostoff shared a draft of this document which is now available in the final version. Many of the pages (beginning at 103) are devoted to titles of studies by category, e.g. cardiovascular. When we are told by the Cancer Society or our Provincial Health Officer (just as examples) that there is no evidence of harm, this list of hundreds, if not thousands, of studies will prove to be an invaluable asset. (thanks to Dr. Kostoff)
THE LARGEST UNETHICAL MEDICAL EXPERIMENT IN HUMAN HISTORY by Ronald N. Kostoff, Ph.D.
“This monograph describes the largest unethical medical experiment in human history: the implementation and operation of non-ionizing non-visible EMF radiation (hereafter called wireless radiation) infrastructure for communications, surveillance, weaponry, and other applications. It is unethical because it violates the key ethical medical experiment requirement for “informed consent” by the overwhelming majority of the participants. The monograph provides background on unethical medical research/experimentation, and frames the implementation of wireless radiation within that context. The monograph then identifies a wide spectrum of adverse effects of wireless radiation as reported in the premier biomedical literature for over seven decades. Even though many of these reported adverse effects are extremely severe, the true extent of their severity has been grossly underestimated….
Humanity is racing along two parallel paths to self-destruction: 1) accelerating irreversible climate change, and 2) rapidly increasing exposure to health and life-threatening mixtures of toxic stimuli. The most ubiquitous constituent of these toxic mixtures is wireless radiation, which is proceeding to blanket humanity and its ecological life support chain. A small fraction of the population has given informed consent to wireless radiation exposure, gambling (like users of cigarettes, cocaine, fentanyl) that they can escape the severe adverse consequences of exposure. Another small fraction of the population has not given informed consent, but receives harmful second-hand exposure because of the broad-scale transmission of wireless radiation from terrestrial and satellite sources. The vast majority of the population has given Mis-informed Consent to this exposure. This mis-information is supplied by the telecommunications industry, its lobbyists, its government partners, its political enablers, its marketing arm (the mainstream media), and even some academic enablers.
2) ICNIRP, the industry-associated/run group that somehow determines what RF exposure levels “are safe”, once said the public needed to be protected from the worry that implementation of the Precautionary Principle would cause. This hypocrisy, posing as responsibility, continues at ICNIRP. The question is why are WHO, Health Canada, FCC guided by this dangerous, biased group of corporate and military bent engineers and researchers?
The Australian 5G inquiry and Whirling Dervishes…
“ICNIRP only considers acute effects in its precautionary principle approach. Consideration of long-term effects is not possible. Precautionary actions to address public concerns may increase rather than mitigate worries and fears of the public. This constitutes a health detriment and should be prevented as other adverse effects of EME.”
3) The promises given by industry re. use of our data via the 5G grid and the internet of things might be fulfilled in China already. This video is 2 years old. Is this OUR future?
(click on photo to enlarge)
In Your Face: China’s all-seeing state
Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“Today the tyrant rules not by club or fist, but disguised as a market researcher, he shepherds his flocks in the ways of utility and comfort.” Marshall McLuhan