2019-10-30 ISED policy must be changed

1)  A prime example of what is happening because the ISED policy allows transmitters to be installed on an existing structure with no notice to or consultation with those living in the area. If the owner of the property wants the money and agrees, there is little that can be done.  I hope that an effort is made to inform those living in or near this building to let them know what has happened, and that their health has been put into jeopardy.  The owner can be sued and cannot buy insurance to protect him.  This is the “loophole” that allows microcells to be put on telephone poles outside our homes without telling us.  This policy must be changed and our MPs could put pressure on ISED about it.  

This is from a member in Victoria:

“I saw a weird shack added to the side of an apartment building a block and a half from my place….then I saw what looked like maybe a metal run for affixing a large air duct to and thought maybe a building HVAC upgrade of some kind.

Well that wasn’t a metal run for ducting – it’s a huge cable run and the 3 LARGE antennae are now on the roof – 2 facing towards Esquimalt across “the Gorge” inlet and the 3rd is facing back towards my place but pointed roughly at the road behind the houses behind ours….and of course more up than down, but I bet the signals aren’t direct and rather more of a fan.

Gorge Towers
200 Gorge Rd W, Victoria, BC V9A 1M5″

2)  A New York State Assemblyman has introduced a Bill that, if passed, would require 5G’s safety to be investigated. New Hampshire has done this already and Oregon, Montana and Louisiana are addressing the general wireless radiation issue.  We should ask for each province to establish a commission to investigate 5G.

AN  ACT  establishing a commission to study the environmental and health  effects of evolving 5G technology; and providing  for  the  repeal  of  such provisions upon expiration thereof


3)  Here is yet more proof that more than 40 years ago, the governments and industry knew that microwave radiation was dangerous and caused biological effects. Why were lax standards maintained in the West?  For fear that the military and industry would have to make expensive modifications. Certainly, there is enough evidence for some tobacco-like lawsuits.  Profit at any cost — even our health and that of future generations.

The introduction is by Dr. Magda Havas.

#023: Research on Biological Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation in Eurasian Communist Countries, 1976

“This document clearly reflects the U.S. military’s resistance to lowering the guideline and their distrust of research conducted in the Eastern Block Countries.  That distrust and the power wielded by the U.S. military is largely responsible for the status of the  current guidelines, which fail to protect public and worker health.”


 Study report by Defence Intelligence Agency

“If the more advanced nations of the West are strict in the enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there could be unfavorable effects on industrial output and military function. The Eurasian Communist countries could, on the other hand, give lip service to strict standards, but allow their military to operate without restriction and thereby gain the advantage in electronic warfare techniques and the development of antipersonnel applications.” [page vii]

“Should subsequent research result in adoption of the Soviet standard by other countries, industries whose practices are based on less stringent safety regulations, could be required to make costly modifications in order to protect workers. Recognition of the 0.01 mW/cm2 standard could also limit the application of new technology by making the commercial exploitation of some products unattractive because of increased cost, imposed by the need for additional safeguards.” [page 24]


 4) Little is known about the gas smeters that FortisBC hopes to get permission to install but a lot of information, based on the photo of the smeter provided by FortisBC, has been gathered. It is available at:


(click on photo to enlarge)

If anyone attends a public meeting and gets more information, please send it to me at:


with “Fortis smeter” on the subject line.


Something that a member sent in, suggesting that perhaps some of our politicians might see the relevance to this example of arrogance and stupidity.  Perhaps send your Councillor, MLA or MP who will not meet with you or answer your email with more than a form letter:

“A lady in a faded gingham dress and her husband, dressed in a homespun threadbare suit, stepped off the train in Boston, and walked timidly without an appointment into the Harvard University President’s outer office. The secretary could tell in a moment that such backwoods, country hicks had no business at Harvard and probably didn’t even deserve to be in Cambridge. “We’d like to see the president, “the man said softly.

“He’ll be busy all day,” the secretary snapped…. “We’ll wait,” the lady replied.

For hours the secretary ignored them, hoping that the couple would finally become discouraged and go away.

They didn’t, and the secretary grew frustrated and finally decided to disturb the president, even though it was a chore she always regretted.

“Maybe if you see them for a few minutes, they’ll leave,” she said to him!

He sighed in exasperation and nodded. Someone of his importance obviously didn’t have the time to spend with them, and he detested gingham dresses and homespun suits cluttering up his outer office.

The president, stern faced and with dignity, strutted toward the couple.

The lady told him, “We had a son who attended Harvard for one year. He loved Harvard. He was happy here.  But about a year ago, he was accidentally killed.  My husband and I would like to erect a memorial to him, somewhere on campus.”

The president wasn’t touched. He was shocked.  “Madam,” he said, gruffly, “we can’t put up a statue for every person who attended Harvard and died. If we did, this place would look like a cemetery.”

“Oh, no,” the lady explained quickly. “We don’t want to erect a statue.  We thought we would like to give a building to Harvard.”

The president rolled his eyes. He glanced at the gingham dress and homespun suit, then exclaimed, “A building!  Do you have any earthly idea how much a building costs? We have over seven and a half million dollars in the physical buildings here at Harvard.”

For a moment the lady was silent. The president was pleased. Maybe he could get rid of them now.

The lady turned to her husband and said quietly, “Is that all it cost to start a university?  Why don’t we just start our own?”

Her husband nodded. The president’s face wilted in confusion and bewilderment.

Mr. and Mrs. Leland Stanford got up and walked away, traveling to Palo Alto, California where they established the university that bears their name, Stanford University, a memorial to a son that Harvard no longer cared about.

You can easily judge the character of others by how they treat those who they think can do nothing for them.

     A TRUE STORY by Malcolm Forbes”
“People will forget what you said; People will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”


Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“The earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are killing it have names and addresses.”              – Utah Phillips


Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation