2019-08-07 WHO corruption told by a former WHO employee

1) There have been many reports on the health of younger people being worse than that of older folks, with evidence that environmental factors are the cause. Those born after 1990 have been exposed to many toxins to which prior generations were not exposed or exposed in some quantity, and microwave radiation is one of these toxins.  There are many studies showing that EMR affects the heart and I’ve included just 3 links as examples.

Heart attack rates are increasing among those under 40, according to disturbing new study

As reported by Everyday Health, research discussed at the American College of Cardiology’s Annual Scientific Session, held in March of this year, revealed that heart attacks in adults under the age of 40 rose by an average of 2 percent each year between 2006 and 2016.”


#024: Microwave Radiation Affects the Heart 


Microwave radiation exposures affect cardiovascular system and antioxidants modify the effect


Radiation from wireless technology affects the blood, the heart, and the autonomic nervous system


2)  A video of the Pitt Meadows Council meeting discussion re the proposed cell tower and the Resolution to write the letter regarding health concerns. Some very intelligent comments by Council members. They obviously have listened to their very well-informed constituents and have done their homework.

One Councillor, Simpson, states that she is not aware of studies done re. cell towers. Rather than asking for more studies, which IMHO is not needed, the Resolution should ask for Health Canada to revise safeguards to reflect current scientific evidence and to base them on the biological effects proven by these studies. Asking for more studies accomplishes nothing. First, there are already 1000s that confirm harm to various biological systems. Second, industry wants to say there is a need for more studies to delay there being any improved health standards. Time is not on our side. We can’t waste more asking for more studies.

Pitt Meadows Council – Cell Tower Review, Letter on Safety Code 6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Mf2W3NReEw    (47 min.)

3)  Olga Sheean, a former WHO employee and now a whistleblower, is spreading the word about the corruption in the agency (corruption that has existed for decades) that is deliberately misleading the world about EMR and the dangers of wireless radiation.  I believe I’ve shared this video before and the accompanying document, but it is vital that this reach as many people as possible. We need to demand a public awareness campaign so that people can make informed decisions about the wireless gadgets, and 5G, that are making them and their children ill.  Since Health Canada has ignored recommendations by the HESA committee to have such a campaign, it could be up to us to organize this. Education is crucial – and THE RIGHT TO KNOW is a right.


https://www.emfoff.com/cover-up/   (video 19 min.)

4) Dr. Arazi has reported that he has found that hundreds of cell phones used by millions in Europe emit higher levels of microwave radiation than allowed even by the very high ICNIRP standards.  Dr. Om Gandhi found that similar results in phones he tested in the US. Of course these very same cell phones are used in Canada, with no warnings. Hundreds of studies confirm that cell phone use is associated clearly with brain cancers, and telecoms are made to put warnings in their manuals (knowing that few will read them).  Yet Health Canada, like the FCC in the US, refuses to require warning labels on the phones themselves that would give the customers a chance to know that cell phones must be kept close to 1 inch from the body at all time when turned on.  And all the agencies are ignoring the fact that the cell phones are emitting radiation at a level that exceeds the extremely high levels of SC 6.

Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and the US When Touching the Body 

“ It is not sufficient for manufacturers to start recommending that the microwave radiating devices be held at distances of 5 to 25 millimeters away from the body to reduce measured SAR to meet the safety standards since these suggested distances cannot be maintained correctly without use of properly attached spacers. Even though ANFR of France has to date released the higher SAR data that does not meet the safety compliance standards when the telephones are held against the body, similar results have also been obtained by independent testing in Canada.” 


https://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/episodes/2016-2017/the-secret-inside-your-phone   (Canadian testing, CBC)

5)  Below is a powerful letter to the Minister of Education, who has yet to respond, just as he has yet to respond to so many written to him over the years.  As said in this letter, our health authorities, school authorities and politicians are being wilfully negligent with regard to exposing children and teachers to wifi for hours every school day. A safe (and better) alternative is readily available. Why isn’t it being used?  Parents are largely uninformed because the powers-that-be refused to allow information to be provided either at PAC meetings or by volunteers parents handing out flyers.

Please share this letter widely. And shame on the NDP and the health authorities for not responding to concerns, ignoring letters like this.


Subject:  Parents have been robbed of their right to protect their children.

Date:  19 June 2019

From:   Janis Hoffmann  (name given with permission)

To: educ.minister@gov.bc.ca

CC:  DM.Education@gov.bc.ca, hlth.minister@gov.bc.ca, hlth.dmoffice@gov.bc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca, bonnie.henry@gov.bc.ca, alison.wensink@gov.bc.ca

Dear Mr. Rob Fleming,

Parents have been robbed of their right to protect their children from harm because YOU HAVE MADE THE DECISION not to ban the use of Cell Phones in BC classrooms and yet your child is benefiting from the one Middle School in Victoria with a ban of cell phones.  The Ontario government allowed the parents to make an informed decisionwhich resulted in over 80% of parents voting in favour of the cell phone ban in their classrooms.

It’s clear the constant use of cell phones is interfering with our children’s ability to interact and develop healthy relationships in the real world.  This addiction is robbing our children of the opportunity to build life skills that include critical thinking, communication, cooperation, and the ability to focus.

Besides the negative impact this addiction has on learning, parents, teachers and students are aware of the SCIENTIFIC FACT that microwave radiation exposure causes biological effects confirming the growing evidence of neurological effects and developmental delays with irreversible health effects, such as Depression, Suicide, Violence, Anxiety, Autism, Addiction, Behavioral Issues, Heart Episodes, Infertility, ADD/ADHD, Compromised Ability to Learn, Headaches, Nose/Ear Bleeds, Brain Fog, Difficulty Concentrating, and Cancer.  As documented in over 28,000 published peer-reviewed studies by scientists and medical experts. 


If one cell phone causes cancer, then what happens when you enter a school where there is 25 cell phones and 25 chrome books downloading in just one classroom, with multiple commercial Wi-Fi routers, white boards with over head projectors, wireless audio systems through out the school, surrounded by cell towers, small cells, Wi-Fi hotspots. What are the levels of radiation that our children are experiencing daily in our classrooms?  Who has put an exposure control plan in place, measuring levels of radiation, educating students and staff of the safe use of wireless products as per the federally mandated safety manual, who is identifying risks, monitoring health and documenting the results?

Portland, Oregon has just passed Bill 283 directing Oregon Health Authority to review peer-reviewed, independently funded scientific studies of health effects of exposure to microwave radiation, particularly exposure that results from use of wireless network technologies in schools and to report results of review to interim committee of Legislative Assembly related to education not later than January 2, 2021.  Specifies requirements for review.  Directs Department of Education to develop recommendations to schools in this state for practices and alternative technologies that reduce students’ exposure to microwave radiation that Oregon Health Authority report identifies as harmful.  Declares emergency, effective on passage.


Yet your position as Ministry of Education and our Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, Ministry of Health, Adrian Dix, Deputy Minister of Health, Stephen Brown and Premier, John Horgan, have refused our request for an official response to the findings of the US National Toxicology Program Expert Panel and the supporting Ramazzini Institute who concluded that there is “Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity” and the association of cancer in the heart and brain and cell phone radiation.

Children are still putting these devices to their heads, abdomens and in their pockets when the Safety Manuals clearly state” keep phone at least 15mm (5/8inch) away from the body, and only use carrying cases, belt clips or holders that do not have metal parts and that maintain at least 15mm (5/8) separation between the cell phone and the body.”  A new study has just been released showing cell phones exceed safety limits when the phone touches the body.  Professor Om Gandhi examined data from 450 cell phones and found the phone can emit 11 times over the US FCC limit.  


Why is the government refusing to educate parents, teachers and students on the safe use of these wireless devices?  Just recently an Italian court ordered the government (Ministries of the Environment and Education) to launch a campaign to advise the public of the health risks from mobile and cordless phones.


Our government has willfully dismissed all credible health information presented to them from qualified experts, nationally and internationally, which emphasizes children’s heightened vulnerabilities and the need for “precautionary” measures to reduce exposure and risk from the harmful effects.

The most current letter on file is dated July 2011, from our School Health Officer, Dr. Stanwick, who was unable to provide us with any peer-reviewed studies stating the safety of microwave radiation exposure. Dr. Stanwick instead has shifted “the responsibility for professional oversight” to the Provincial Health Officer. Dr. Stanwick, appears to have no educational background on the biological health effects of RF radiation exposure, yet has endorsed the installation of a known 2b carcinogen listed next to lead, DDT, methyl mercury, chloroform, and car exhaust as an acceptable risk in our schools. It’s 2019 and we want to know is Cancer an acceptable risk too?

As the Minister of Education you have a moral and legal obligation, after being notified of the “clear evidence” of cancer, to “act in good faith,” by taking measures to mitigate the risk of harm to our children while under your care.

We are requesting again, the opportunity to talk to you in person about this health crisis.  Please do not waste your time sending us a form letter.


Janis Hoffmann

We don’t want our children to become the next statistic! 

School Cell Tower Shuts Down After Teachers And Students Diagnosed With Cancer



Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters 

“The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.”       B.F. Skinner



Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation