2019-01-06 Has the telecom industry corrupted the UN, too?

1)    The United Nations has been notified of the dangers of EMR, and has done nothing. In May 2018 a direct appeal was made by a staff member to the Secretary-General about the unsafe working conditions in the UN building. The Secretary General claims that such dangers are new to him –  a physicist and electrical engineer who has a history that disputes his statement of ignorance.  It does appear as if the telecom has influenced the UN as well as it has WHO, ICNIRP, and Health Canada.

UN staff member: 5G is war on humanity

The first eight months of WWII with no fighting was called The Phoney War. Using millimetre waves as a fifth-generation or 5G wireless communications technology is a phoney war of another kind.

 “I did my best for two and a half years to alert the UN staff union, administration and medical service to the danger to the health of UN staff of EMR from these access points, but was ignored. That’s why, in May 2018, I took the issue to the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres [transcript]. He is a physicist and electrical engineer and lectured on telecommunications signals early in his career, yet asserted that he knew nothing about this. He undertook to ask the World Health Organization to look into it, but seven months later those public access points remain in place. I received no replies to my many follow-up emails.

As a result, I welcomed the opportunity to join the effort to publish an International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space because it was clear to me that, despite there having been 43 earlier scientific appeals, very few people understood the dangers of EMR. My experience as an editor could help ensure that a new 5G appeal, including the issue of beaming 5G from space, was clear, comprehensive, explanatory, and accessible to the non-scientist. The International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space is fully referenced, citing over a hundred scientific papers among the tens of thousands on the biological effects of EMR published over the last 80 years.”


2)  Lucy Sanford, a Building Biologist, has created and shared a PowerPoint about EHS from which she has suffered severely, and offers some sage advice.

How we are affected by today’s technological world.


or   https://tinyurl.com/SanfordPP

3)  A comment that was written on our website which makes points that many of us have forgotten.  And, not surprisingly, has found yet evidence of another lie that Hydro has told us to justify smeters.  Initially, BC Hydro and FortisBC justified their smeter programs by reporting unsupported amounts of dollars lost to theft of power by grow ops The figures grew from relatively small amounts to much larger amounts as the costs of the program increased. Of course no one provided proof to support the claims that huge amounts were lost each year but from the beginning experts warned that it is easier to steal from and to hack a smeter than it is to hack an analog.

“I think part of your topics should include that the SM program was rolled out by politicians to stop the theft of power from illegal marijuana grow opts. But just in Dec 2018 in Squamish BC they busted an illegal grow opt (sic) that was stealing power. Another lie by BC hydro and politicians. The SM program was suppose (sic) to stop the theft of power. But slam me with a bill saying my analog meter is illegal, and meanwhile keep letting grow opts “steal” power and cost the consumer. And I am sure there are plenty more grow opts out there stealing power, because of there (sic) wonderful revenue friendly SM program. As a medically disabled person John Horgan gave me a raise in income. Then he clawed it back with ICBC and BC Hydro. And in the end I had less income from the raise I got. Sounds about right, some are more equal on this animal farm. Soon they will ask for a raise in there pay and they will get, because they can’t seem to get by on a six figure income. LOL!!!

You can see all comments on this post here:

4)  Below in Letters is a stream of emails between a concerned grandmother who has been attempting to educate school trustees on the dangers of having Wi-Fi in schools and a couple of trustees. I have shared some of these before but include them again so you can see the negligence that is rampant . It is obvious that they do not wish to learn or that they have been told they cannot learn about Wi-Fi. The second trustee to respond, Jepsen, quotes verbatim the last response from the first. And the first, from Reichelt in her email at the very bottom, indicates a very limited knowledge of the issue, and the final one a lack of willingness to do her job.

I hope that you will consider writing to your school trustees, you can easily use some of the great info that Janis has written in so many of her emails. It’s time we became strong advocates for safe schools.

[http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/schools/bcmap.htm  &  http://bcsta.org/]



From: Janis Hoffmann [mailto:parentsforsafeschools@gmail.com]
Sent: January 2, 2019 9:59 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Fwd: How safe are our children in school where microwave radiation exposure is mandatory?

I sent this out to ALL the trustees in BC and here is one response!!!  He is a government worker (can tell by his email address).

Do you know what TRAN:EX means in his email address?  His school district is Nicola-Similkameen.


[Brian Jepsen – http://dir.gov.bc.ca/gtds.cgi?show=Branch&organizationCode=TRAN&organizationalUnitCode=R2CORPSRV



From: Jepsen, Brian TRAN:EX <Brian.Jepsen@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 7:38 AM
Subject: RE: How safe are our children in school where microwave radiation exposure is mandatory?
To: Janis Hoffmann <parentsforsafeschools@gmail.com>

Hi Janis,

I understand that you are very passionate about this issue. I will be honest with you and tell you that I am not concerned about the risks of WiFi and cell phones. It is not something I will be addressing as a school trustee.

Brian Jepsen



From: Janis Hoffmann [mailto:parentsforsafeschools@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 1, 2019 8:32 PM
Subject: How safe are our children in school where microwave radiation exposure is mandatory?

Dear Willow Reichelt,

This issue is not a passion but a real concern regarding the latest scientific proof of harm to our children from the microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology in our classrooms.  The School Boards have wilfully dismissed credible health information presented to them from qualified experts, nationally and internationally, which emphasizes children’s heightened vulnerabilities and the need for “precautionary” measures to reduce exposure and risk from the harmful effects now.

The game changer is “Clear Evidence” of Cancer a Scientific Fact.     https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300355

Trustees have an obligation to do their due diligence by researching the latest peer reviewed studies or requesting a current safety letter from our Provincial Health Officer in order to make a complete assessment regarding the safety of our children while they are in your care. Trustees have a “duty” to provide our children with a safe learning environment.

Parents, teachers and students are frustrated because we have contacted the Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, Ministry of Health, Mr. Adrian Dix, Ministry of Education, Mr. Rob Fleming, Premier, Mr. John Horgan, requesting an official response to the findings of the US National Toxicology Program Expert Panel who concluded that there is “Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity” and the association of cancer in the heart and brain and cell phone radiation only to be ignored. This information warrants the solicitation of a current letter, re Wi-Fi safety from Dr. Bonnie Henry to ensure the latest peer reviewed studies and recommendations are being applied to make a sound decision regarding our children’s health and well-being.

All our letters, emails and requests for an appointment to discuss this important health issue have fallen on deaf ears.

The most current letter on file is dated July 2011, from our School Health Officer, Dr. Stanwick, who was unable to provide us with any peer-reviewed studies stating the safety of microwave radiation exposure.  Dr. Stanwick instead has shifted “the responsibility for professional oversight” to the Provincial Health Officer.  Dr. Stanwick, appears to have no educational background on the biological health effects of RF radiation exposure, yet has endorsed the installation of a known 2b carcinogen listed next to lead, DDT, methyl mercury, chloroform, and car exhaust as an acceptable risk in our schools.  It’s 2019 and is Cancer an acceptable risk too?

The BC Government has failed to do their due diligence and take immediate action to mitigate the risk by informing the School Boards throughout the province of the established health risks associated with long term exposure to microwave radiation by recommending the use of hard wired connections to access the Internet in our schools. For as little as a one time cost of $500 US dollars every classroom would be provided with 40 Ethernet ports plus adapters for their wireless devices, costing about $20 per child, a small price to pay compared to brain surgery, chemotherapy, radiation treatments etc. http://octowired.com/ 

Health is a Provincial responsibility and we are calling on the School Boards to request a current letter from our Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry regarding the safety of wireless technology in our schools.


Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools


On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:33 PM Willow Reichelt <willow_reichelt@sd33.bc.ca> wrote:

Hi Janis,

I understand that you are very passionate about this issue. I will be honest with you and tell you that I am not concerned about the risks of WiFi and cell phones. It is not something I will be addressing as a school trustee.

Willow Reichelt

Board Vice Chair, SD33

(604) 701-7377


On Dec 14, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Janis Hoffmann <parentsforsafeschools@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Willow Reichelt,

Thank you for your response to the Parents for Safe Schools update regarding the latest information on the safety of wireless technology. The American Cancer Society, like a lot of other organizations, has a conflict of interest and because it depends heavily on the donations can be easily influence to support certain corporations.  Below is an article that sums up how the wireless industry is protecting its investment.

How Big Wireless Made Us Think That Cell Phones Are Safe: A Special Investigation

An excellent history of the industry, through various and well-known “bent” scientists deceiving the public, demeaning independent researchers, all to protect the telecoms who are knowingly exposing all of us to a very dangerous product. Just as guilty, IMHO, are the agencies such as Health Canada, Cancer Society, WHO which use the bent science to support the status quo, by deliberately misinforming the public about the unregulated wireless technology, which has never been tested for safety.

Lack of definitive proof that a technology is harmful does not mean the technology is safe, yet the wireless industry has succeeded in selling this logical fallacy to the world. In truth, the safety of wireless technology has been an unsettled question since the industry’s earliest days. The upshot is that, over the past 30 years, billions of people around the world have been subjected to a massive public-health experiment: Use a cell phone today, find out later if it causes cancer or genetic damage…


In April 2018, we contacted Dr. Bonnie Henry, our BC Provincial Health Officer and asked her to provide the public with an official response to the findings of the $25 million, US National Toxicology Program and the supporting Ramazzini Studies that concluded that there is “Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity” and the association of cancer in the heart and brain and cell phone radiation.

This information accompanied with the over 26,000 peer reviewed studies by scientists and medical experts https://www.emf-portal.org/en is more than enough evidence to warrant the solicitation of a current letter re Wi-Fi safety from Dr. Bonnie Henry to ensure the most accurate health information and recommendations for all children were being used as a basis for sound decision making on such an important topic as our children’s health and well-being.

A Canadian cancer specialist who testified before the Parliamentary Committee says Philpott’s failure to acknowledge the Committee’s findings is dangerous.  “We are already seeing increases in Glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain cancer,” said Dr. Anthony Miller, a cancer epidemiologist with the University of Toronto, who has been an advisor to the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

“This type brain cancer has been directly connected to cell phone use,” he said, referring to the findings of a $25 million US government study released in June.”


There has been no response from Dr. Bonnie Henry, Adrian Dix, Ministry of Health or Premier, John Horgan.  They have refused to provide parents, teachers and students with a statement about the safety of wireless technology in our schools given the latest studies proving health risks from this exposure.

What you might find interesting is, Tim Singer from Health Canada responded to our letter concerning the radiation levels in our schools by stating, Health Canada is aware of concerns related to Wi-Fi in schools, such decisions are not within Health Canada’s mandate. We recommend that you continue to consult your local school board or provincial authority to discuss your concerns.

The BC Ministry of Education has stated they set educational standards, allocates funds and monitors student achievement but decisions regarding the planning and delivery of supports and services for all students are the responsibility of local boards of education and school district administrators. This includes decisions around exposure to RF frequencies and the use of WiFi in the classroom setting.

The responsibility has now been put on the shoulders of the School Boards and the BC Provincial Health Officer even though the BC Ministry of Education has been promoting the use of this technology in our schools.

I am sure you can see why we are so frustrated when we can’t even get an answer from our Premier, John Horgan.

If you have any more questions let me know.


Janis Hoffmann

Vancouver Island Rep for C4ST



For as little as a one time cost of $500 US dollars every classroom could be provided with 40 Ethernet ports plus adapters for their wireless devices.  http://octowired.com/


On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:20 AM Willow Reichelt <willow_reichelt@sd33.bc.ca> wrote:

Hi Janis,

From my understanding, the evidence for cell phones causing cancer is weak. This article from the American Cancer Society does a good job of explaining the studies that have been done. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/cellular-phones.html

One positive thing is that studies that have shown any increased risk of cancer from cell phones (most show not increase) have shown that risk being related to holding the phone to the ear to talk; in my experience, young people these days do the vast majority of their cell phone communication by texting rather than talking, which should minimize their risk.

Willow Reichelt

Board Vice Chair, SD33

(604) 701-7377


Sharon Noble, Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters

“The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.”   ~ Albert Einstein


Smart Meters, Cell Towers, Smart Phones, 5G and all things that radiate RF Radiation