[5G Microcells / Small Cells Siting Legislation – AAEM – Addiction – Adolph Hitler Technique – Adrenal – Aluminum – Alzheimer’s – Anxiety – ART Testing – Ashwaganda – Autism (Stephanie Seneff) – Benefits Inflated – Big Telecom – Birds – Broccoli Sprouts – Cancer – Candida – CBC Ombudsman Reply Letters (Esther Enkin, Jennifer McGuire) – Cell Towers – Children – Chlorella – Chronic Illness – Costs – DE – Democracy – Depression – DNA – Doctor Devra Davis – Dietrich Klinghardt – Driverless Cars – EEA – EHS / ES Suicides (Carsten Häublein, Jenny Fry) – ElectroSmog – EMF – EMR – Environment – EWG Cell Phone Survey – FDA – Fluoride – Glyphosate – Health Canada – HESA 2015 Recommendations – Inaccurate Readings – Insects – Insomnia – International Doctors Appeal 2012 – Jonathan Wright – Katie Kheel – Lyme Disease – Marcus Schluschen Letter to Bethany Lindsay, Diane Girard, Gabrielle Emond re CBC Article on Complaint to BCHRT BC Human Rights Tribunal & Decision by Walter Rilkoff – Martha Herbert – Martin Blank – MCS – NASA Chemtrail Program (Geoengineering, Leaded Jet 1 Fuel, Nano Particles) – Norman Karl Trerise (Conflicts of Interest) – Not So Smart by BIG (Kushal Patel) – Ofgem – Olga Sheean – Protective Clothing – Retroviruses (Judy Mikovits, Frank Ruscetti) – RF – Riina Brae – Ritchie Shoemaker (Mold) – Safety – Sauna Therapy – Scare Tactics – Smart Energy GB (Robert Cheesewright) – Smart Meter Replacements – Toxic Metals – Vaccines – Vehicle Radar – Wi-Fi – Wireless | BC – Canada – Australia – England – Germany – Iran – Russia – Switzerland – UK – Hawaii & Puerto Rico & Woodinville, Washington, USA] & Transcript
1) The Candida Summit allows those who have purchased the DVDs of the series to share transcripts. One member was kind enough to share Dr. Klinghardt’s presentation.
(click on photos to enlarge)
2) In the UK, 93 parliamentarians have signed a report saying that the smeters and the program have many problems and benefits have been far overstated (see pg. 6-8 for specifics). Costs are higher than projected, timing is considerably off – requiring many more years than initially planned – new smeters are replacing the older smeters before every home has a smeter. But yet, they believe that the program should continue to allow real time energy usage info so people will use less!! The projected reduction in energy bills is £11 a year in 2020 and maybe as much as £47 by 2030. The costs will never be recovered at that rate, and security remains a concern. A very interesting report because the problems are very similar to programs everywhere — I bet, if truth be known, including BC.
MP: “The roll out of smart meters has been a cock up and a catastrophe. Energy firms are now using it as a soft form of trapping people into poor deals as they can’t switch providers without their meters going dumb.”
‘Smart meters will save consumers just £11 a year’
3) From Katie Kheel, re. “what is 5G”.
After considering the downsides of the 5g and the IoT, it is our hope you will feel moved to take action to protect yourself, your community, and our Earth. We need you!!
Please also check out our Facebook Page, https://www.facebook.com/whatis5g/, and consider sharing your thoughts and questions in the Facebook Group, Responding to 5g and the Internet of Things, https://www.facebook.com/groups/637378223136039/ .
4) EWG (Environmental Working Group) is taking a survey asking if people are concerned about cell phone radiation. They ask for an email address and, at the end, for a donation. This group is involved in many environmental issues and perhaps they are trying to engage with those of us interested in EMR. Here is their website: https://www.ewg.org/ .
5) Below is another excellent letter re. the CBC article. Many of us who wrote to CBC’s Commissioner of Ethics and Values received the same response from the Ombudsman, saying that the letter has been sent to the Editor. It appears that they are taking our complaints seriously. Let’s hope that CBC will do what’s right, and what we expect: present the other side of the HRT story in another article. The public needs to know the facts. Fingers are crossed that there will be another article with the accurate info about EHS and the family’s situation.
From: CBC Ombudsman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Jennifer McGuire <email@example.com>; COMMISSAIRE AUX VALEURS ET A L’ETHIQUE BUREAU <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: July 23, 2018
Subject: Re: No proof B.C. boy’s migraines caused by Wi-Fi, tribunal rules
This office was forwarded your complaint by the Values and Ethics Commissioner. I have shared it with Jennifer McGuire, General Manager and Editor in Chief of CBC News, so that she will be aware of your concerns.
From: Marcus Schluschen (name given with permission)
To: email@example.com ; firstname.lastname@example.org ; email@example.com
Sent: July 23, 2018
Subject: Ethical press?
Re: BC Tribunal and WiFi
No proof B.C. boy’s migraines caused by Wi-Fi, tribunal rules – Ms. Bethany Lindsay – CBC News, Jul. 17, 2018
Dear Ms. Lindsay,
Your CBC story, July 17, 2018, about a boy with electro hypersensitivity, was unfortunately not well researched and void of journalistic balance. If you would have investigated the subject of electro hypersensitivity (EHS) diligently, as what is generally expected of CBC reporters, you would have learned that the influence of the wireless industry reaches deep into the federal and provincial governments and, most shockingly, right into the office of the BC Human Rights Tribunal.
The Sheean case was ‘handled’ by BC Human Rights Lawyer, Norman Karl Trerise, who was a SENIOR partner in the firm, Fasken Martineau, whose website extols: a close working relationship, with the world’s largest telecom firms, such as ROGERS and other large telecom giants.
Clearly, such disturbing conflicts of interests should be worth in-depth scrutiny by CBC’s investigative journalists.
If you would have been diligent in your research, regarding electro hypersensitivity and the dangers wireless technologies, especially for children, you would have learned of the deep concerns expressed by the Canadian Parliamentary Standing Committee on Health (HESA) after meeting with numerous international EMF experts over several days in Ottawa.
HESA 2015 – 12 Recommendations on Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation and the Health of Canadians
RECOMMENDATION 2: That Statistics Canada consider including questions related to electromagnetic hypersensitivity in the Canadian Community Health Survey.
RECOMMENDATION 3: That the Government of Canada, through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, consider funding research into electromagnetic hypersensitivity testing, diagnosis and treatment, and its possible impacts on health in the workplace.
RECOMMENDATION 4: That the Canadian Medical Association, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons, the College of Family Physicians of Canada and the World Health Organization consider updating their guidelines and continuing education materials regarding the diagnosis and treatment of electromagnetic hypersensitivity to ensure they are based on the latest scientific evidence and reflect the symptoms of affected Canadians.
RECOMMENDATION 5: That the Government of Canada continue to provide reasonable accommodations for environmental sensitivities, including electromagnetic hypersensitivity, as required under the Canadian Human Rights Act.
RECOMMENDATION 7: That the Government of Canada establish a system for Canadians to report potential adverse reactions to radiofrequency fields.
RECOMMENDATION 9: That the Government of Canada develop an awareness campaign relating to the safe use of wireless technologies, such as cell phones and Wi-Fi, in key environments such as the school and home to ensure that Canadian families and children are reducing risks related to radiofrequency exposure.
RECOMMENDATION 11: That the Government of Canada, through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, consider funding research into the link between radiofrequency fields and potential health effects such as cancer, genetic damage, infertility, impairment to development and behavior, harmful effects to eyes and on the brain, cardiovascular, biological and biochemical effects.
Dr. Martin Blank, Prof. of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, who is well acquainted with Health Canada, questioned their stunningly naive approach of science and lack of fundamental understanding of biophysics at the HESA hearings. Dr. Blank informed the HESA committee that if Health Canada would hire biologists, instead of engineers, they would have a much better understanding of what happens on a cellular level. He also questioned their motives and methods of their provocation studies and asked why they refuse to use the very same radiation technologies that are known to make electro hypersensitive people seriously sick. Dr. Blank pointed out to the committee they use a device that simulates, instead of using real WiFi or cell tower antenna which emit pulsed, information carrier waves which are scientifically known to cause adverse biological effects. This type of pulsed radiation does not exist in nature.
“. . . when stress protein synthesis is stimulated by radiofrequency or power frequency EMF, the body is telling us in its own language that RF exposure is potentially harmful.”
Dr. Blank’s blunt criticism of Health Canada, during 3 days of hearings of physicians and EMR scientists, can be found on the internet. The hearings also revealed that Health Canada withheld vital information in a document given to the HESA members. Such slight of hand should surely be of interest for CBC’s investigative journalists.
Dr. Martha Herbert, from Harvard University Medical School, explained the links between wireless devices used by pregnant women and the rapid increase of autism in North America.
Dr. Devra Davis, public health expert and co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Price, explained the increasing strong connection between wireless devices and cancer.
Dr. Riina Brae, Medical Director at the Environmental Health Clinic at the Woman’s College Hospital in Toronto, reported on the rapidly rising numbers of Canadians who are becoming electro hypersensitive from common wireless exposures, such as teachers and students in their classrooms.
The International Doctors Appeal, 2012 unequivocally states: “Children and adolescents are most vulnerable. The number of those who suffer from electrohypersensitivity is steadily growing. In those who are affected, severe symptoms to electromagnetic fields can develop immediately or hours after the exposure to technical electromagnetic fields.”
The European Environment Agency called for urgent precautionary action in 2009. The European Parliament repeated this call also in 2009.
The European Council demanded abandoning wireless communication policies, that are seen as unsustainable in their current form, in a unanimous resolution in 2011.
American Academy of Environmental Medicine – Wireless Radiofrequency Radiation in Schoolss
Excerpt: “The peer reviewed, scientific literature demonstrates the correlation between RF exposure and neurological, cardiac, and pulmonary disease as well as reproductive and developmental disorders, immune dysfunction, cancer and other health conditions. The evidence is irrefutable.“
“There is consistent, emerging science that shows people, especially children who are more vulnerable due to developing brains and thinner skulls, are being affected by the increasing exposure to wireless radiation.”
“To install WiFi in schools plus public spaces risks a widespread public health hazard that the medical system is not yet prepared to address.”
International Doctors Appeal, 2012 (medical information on 2 pages)
American Academy of Environmental Medicine, Statement – WiFi in Schools (medical information)
Great information source for journalists:
Excellent research materials regarding WiFi, cell tower and mobile phone radiation in schools.
I spent 9 years researching the adverse effects of RF and EMR since my wife was stricken with electrohypersensitivity (EHS), very much like the boy T., and Ms. Sheean, whose cases were woefully inadequately researched by Walter Rilkoff and industry-friendly Mr. Trerise.
My wife can tell when neighbours are using WiFi, even right in the middle of the night. She feels WiFi in stores.
She can tell when a person carries a cell phone, even if it is hidden in a purse.
She reacts severely to cars anti-collision technologies.
No more visits to restaurants, hotels, movie theaters or concerts. Shopping is reduced to essentials. No more visits to friends and family who live in cities, not even for birthdays.
We moved to a remote region of Vancouver Island to escape the 24/7 RF smog of urban centers!
Luddite? Hardly! She used to work in the engineering offices of TELUS. This has become the bleak reality for many!
Pastor Haublein, Oberammergau, Germany ended his own life because he could not endure the endless suffering of EHS.
Jenny Fry, a young student, took her own life in 2015. She could not endure the endless suffering of electro hypersensitivity. Like in boy T’s electro hypersensitivity case, her school and adults failed her most miserably and refused to switch to a safer and faster, wireless alternative.
A police chief in England, who suffered from severe electro hypersensitivity, ended his own life.
Who are the people affected with EHS? Here is a sample:
Former prime ministers, police chiefs, airline pilots, judges, IT engineers, corporate executives, concert musicians, students, physicians, lab technicians, teachers, actors, scientists, singers, firemen, writers, photographers, builders, soldiers, computer designers, home makers, nurses, architects, lawyers, little children, etc.
I urge the CBC to do an investigative story on the perils of wireless technologies that will uncover the absurdity of blindly following the very same government agency, Health Canada, who told us that Thalidomide, tobacco, lead, asbestos and a host of bio-toxins were perfectly safe, and that AIDS would be a minor event.
I do hope that your future reports will be befitting the higher caliber of CBC journalists, and that you will find the courage to apologize to the family in your last report, which added insult to injury, for T. , whose life and future looks bleak just because uninformed school board officials and negligent governments fail in their duty to protect the children.
Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
The absence of evidence of hazard is not proof of safety”
~ says Dr. Devra Davis