[5G Microcells / Small Cells Antennas Public Right-of-way Siting Legislation – Air Tube Headsets – Airplane Mode – Animals – Annie J. Sasco – Anthony B. Miller – Babies – BC Hydro – Brain – Cancers (Acoustic Neuroma, Glioma) – Cell Phones – Cell Towers – Chemicals – Children – Class 2B – David O. Carpenter – Doctor Devra Davis – EHS – EHT – EMFs – Environment – FCC – Fiorella Belpoggi – Health – Heart & Vestibular Schwannomas – IARC – Joel M. Moskowitz – John Horgan – Jose Domingo – Lennart Hardell – Microwave Radiation – NTP – Ramazzini Institute – RFR – RF Safe – Ronald L. Melnick – Safety – Site C – Smartphones – Sprague-Dawley Rats – Studies – Theodora Scarato – Tumours – WHO – Wi-Fi in Schools – Wireless Devices | BC – Toronto, Ontario – Canada – Belgium – China – France – India – Israel – Italy – Russia – Spain – Sweden – UK – California & Connecticut & Maryland, USA] & (videos) & Websites
1) Partial results are being reported on the 10 year cell tower study done in Italy by the Ramazzini Institute [https://www.ramazzini.org/en/] where rats were exposed to levels of RF which are similar to levels in our environment. They confirm the 10 year study by NTP, and the researchers are calling for a review of the IARC classification of microwave radiation as a possible carcinogen. And with microcells, smeters, Wi-Fi hot spots, etc. the level of RF in our environment is increasing rapidly.
(click on photos to enlarge)
“”Our findings of cancerous tumors in rats exposed to environmental levels of RF are consistent with and reinforce the results of the US NTP studies on cell phone radiation, as both reported increases in the same types of tumors of the brain and heart in Sprague-Dawley rats. Together, these studies provide sufficient evidence to call for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to re-evaluate and re-classify their conclusions regarding the carcinogenic potential of RFR in humans,” said Fiorella Belpoggi PhD, study author and RI Director of Research…
“All of the exposures used in the Ramazzini study were below the US FCC limits. These are permissible exposures according the FCC. In other words, a person can legally be exposed to this level of radiation. Yet cancers occurred in these animals at these legally permitted levels. The Ramazzini findings are consistent with the NTP study demonstrating these effects are a reproducible finding,” explained Ronald Melnick PhD, formerly the Senior NIH toxicologist who led the design of the NTP study on cell phone radiation now a Senior Science Advisor to Environmental Health Trust (EHT).
“Governments need to strengthen regulations to protect the public from these harmful non-thermal exposures.”…
“The evidence indicating wireless is carcinogenic has increased and can no longer be ignored,” stated University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health Professor Emeritus Anthony B. Miller MD, Member of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of Canada and the UK, and Senior Medical Advisor to EHT who is also a long-term advisor to the World Health Organization.
“This study raises concerns that simply living close to a cell tower will pose threats to human health. Governments need to take measures to reduce exposures from cell tower emissions. Cell towers should not be near schools, hospitals or people’s homes. Public health agencies need to educate the public on how to reduce exposure from all sources of wireless radiofrequency radiation—be it from cell towers or cell phones or Wi-Fi in schools,” stated David O. Carpenter MD, former Dean of the School of Public Health at the University at Albany. “This is particularly urgent because of current plans to place small 5G cell towers about every 300 meters in every street across the country. These 5G ‘small cell’ antennas will result in continuous exposure to everyone living nearby and everyone walking down the street. The increased exposures will increase risk of cancer and other diseases such as electro-hypersensitivity.””
From Microwave News, an interview with one of the lead researchers.
Italian RF-Animal Study:
“Consistent with” and “Reinforces” U.S. NTP Cancer Finding
“Ramazzini’s Belpoggi Calls for IARC To Reassess RF–Cancer Risk”
2) Another article by Norman Farrell about the promises broken, the poor decisions made, by John Horgan and the NDP.
Plug pulled on PowerBC
“Before John Horgan was sworn in as Premier, BC NDP promoted a wise alternative to construction of Site C, a dam that would cost many billions of dollars and had no certain customers for electricity generated.”
3) A couple of good 2 minute YouTubes showing that use of air tubes is the only way to listen to music or talk with a “smart” phone or cell phone. Earbuds or headphones will shoot radiation straight into the brain. The “smart” or cell phone will still be emitting radiation, so it should not be placed in a pocket or laid in the lap while using the airtubes. Move the phone as far from the body as possible.
If you listen to music through your smart phone, this happens to your brain
“Has it ever occurred to you that while using headphones to listen to music through your smartphone, you might be radiating your brain? Unfortunately that thought occurred to me, and I did some research and found out that yes in fact, listening to music with your smartphone and headphones is likely to harm you.
According to RF Safe, an organization that has conducted research on radiation claims that EMF radiation travels straight through the wire of a wired headset directly from the headphone jack to the ear, penetrating a person’s head through the ear canal. They say this increases radiation exposure to a person’s brain by 300%.”
Director, Coalition to Stop Smart Meters
“The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.”
~ B.F. Skinner